2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accurate model for the computation of the dose of protons in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, the biophysical properties of He ions are intermediate between those of protons and C-ions (Tessonnier et al 2018), which at the moment are the only two species used in clinical practice. From a physical point of view, He-ion beams show a reduced range straggling and lateral scattering with respect to protons (Kempe et al 2007, Embriaco et al 2017 and a reduced fragmentation tail when compared to C-ions (Ströbele et al 2012), which results in a particularly favorable distribution of physical dose. Furthermore, the He-ion beam biological effectiveness is higher than that of protons, although not as high as that of C-ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the biophysical properties of He ions are intermediate between those of protons and C-ions (Tessonnier et al 2018), which at the moment are the only two species used in clinical practice. From a physical point of view, He-ion beams show a reduced range straggling and lateral scattering with respect to protons (Kempe et al 2007, Embriaco et al 2017 and a reduced fragmentation tail when compared to C-ions (Ströbele et al 2012), which results in a particularly favorable distribution of physical dose. Furthermore, the He-ion beam biological effectiveness is higher than that of protons, although not as high as that of C-ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proton treatments, the physical fluence attenuation of the primary beam due to nuclear interactions is included in the planning software programs, and the contribution to the physical dose from secondary protons is taken into account with different parameterizations [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. On the contrary, heavier target fragments are usually neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%