2017
DOI: 10.1111/appy.12287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of a 6‐item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis

Abstract: The Chinese HAM-D was a reliable, valid, and unidimensional scale of depression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The term 'remission' was applied when symptom levels were low/absent, and operationalised as a HAMD-6 score of ⩽4. 16…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term 'remission' was applied when symptom levels were low/absent, and operationalised as a HAMD-6 score of ⩽4. 16…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting list of studies is presented in Table 2, and an overview of methods and results of each study is presented in Table 3. 6,7,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Four studies included Western samples for comparison. The study by Furukawa and colleagues 15 qualified for this review due to its Japanese sample but also contains a US and a European sample.…”
Section: Results: Part a Factorial Overlap Across Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume this is the number of respondents used to analyse the HDRS. Lee et al 13 China (n ¼ 214) Psychiatric outpatients; 44.4% were in a DSM-IV current major depressive episode. Bachner 14 Israel (n ¼ 125) Bedouin Arabs who were primary carers for cancer patients.…”
Section: Results: Part Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,8,14 In contrast, the 6-item version of the HAMD scale has shown good psychometric properties and has been translated into several languages, including Arabic. [15][16][17][18][19] However, this version does not score for suicidality, which may limit its clinical usefulness. Moreover, a review of the literature did not reveal any other brief validated structured Arabic-language interview-based scale to measure depression severity and response to treatment in clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%