2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-017-0719-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing and Contrasting the Use of Problem-Based Learning in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Programs

Abstract: This small pilot study is intended to provide a snapshot of the state of PBL implementation in CAP fellowship programs. It reflects that programs can incorporate PBL in a variety of ways, tailored to the needs of the institution. Future directions of research include assessment of resident satisfaction with PBL, impact on resident education, and identifying successful methods of implementation of PBL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both approaches leverage the wellestablished benefits of active learning [6]. While there are a handful of reports describing problem-based learning in postgraduate psychiatric education [7][8][9][10], we could not find any published examples of case-based learning in this setting. Nevertheless, we chose to replace the monthly lectures with a weekly, case-based course for several reasons: (1) small group tutorials could create conditions for more active learning; (2) more frequent classes could support improved focus and concentration; (3) more frequent meetings could prompt residents to connect theory with practice more frequently; (4) carefully developed cases could enable a more intentional formal curriculum, avoiding the gaps and redundancies that had been noted in resident feedback; and (5) the more directive casebased approach was felt to be more suitable for senior residents who have limited time for the inquiry of the more open-ended process of problem-based learning.…”
Section: Context and Rationalementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both approaches leverage the wellestablished benefits of active learning [6]. While there are a handful of reports describing problem-based learning in postgraduate psychiatric education [7][8][9][10], we could not find any published examples of case-based learning in this setting. Nevertheless, we chose to replace the monthly lectures with a weekly, case-based course for several reasons: (1) small group tutorials could create conditions for more active learning; (2) more frequent classes could support improved focus and concentration; (3) more frequent meetings could prompt residents to connect theory with practice more frequently; (4) carefully developed cases could enable a more intentional formal curriculum, avoiding the gaps and redundancies that had been noted in resident feedback; and (5) the more directive casebased approach was felt to be more suitable for senior residents who have limited time for the inquiry of the more open-ended process of problem-based learning.…”
Section: Context and Rationalementioning
confidence: 94%
“…It may reflect a weakness of standardized tests developed for knowledge assessment (rather than application) as an outcome measure. Thus, identifying successful assessment methods of modern educational formats, as well as more effective measures of residents' satisfaction and the impact on their clinical competence, is fundamental (5,31).…”
Section: Quantitative Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBL model is not specifically intended to improve academic skills, but also to empower capabilities or abilities (Sonmez, Duygu -Lee, 2003). The PBL model can integrate knowledge and practice well in learning (Savery, 2006;Stankunas, Czabanowska, Avery, Kalediene, & Babich, 2016) and can also be integrated into various ways, tailored to the needs of the institution (Peeples et al, 2017). Research at the Dental School in India, students desire to have active student-centered learning with more clinically oriented teaching using audio-visual aids with comprehensive patient care training to assist in their future clinical practice (Sen & Kundabala, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%