2017
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of labyrinthine fistula after repair with bone pate

Abstract: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1643-1648, 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 However, criticisms of these strategies exist because of the risk of delayed sensorineural hearing loss caused by the potentially pernicious environment of an infected open mastoid cavity and the residual matrix. 7,12 Alternatively, one-stage complete resection of the cholesteatoma matrix on the fistula has been recommended by some authors because of effective disease control and longterm hearing preservation, 13,14 in which the hearing outcomes were independent of complete matrix removal from the top of the fistula post-operatively. 7 Building on these recommendations, the results of our study, which has a level of evidence of 3, demonstrate that a one-stage complete resection of the matrix on the fistula was safe and that the surgical technique itself did not result in iatrogenic sensorineural deafness, which is a complication in patients with cholesteatoma and a labyrinthine fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,11 However, criticisms of these strategies exist because of the risk of delayed sensorineural hearing loss caused by the potentially pernicious environment of an infected open mastoid cavity and the residual matrix. 7,12 Alternatively, one-stage complete resection of the cholesteatoma matrix on the fistula has been recommended by some authors because of effective disease control and longterm hearing preservation, 13,14 in which the hearing outcomes were independent of complete matrix removal from the top of the fistula post-operatively. 7 Building on these recommendations, the results of our study, which has a level of evidence of 3, demonstrate that a one-stage complete resection of the matrix on the fistula was safe and that the surgical technique itself did not result in iatrogenic sensorineural deafness, which is a complication in patients with cholesteatoma and a labyrinthine fistula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 However, criticisms of these strategies exist because of the risk of delayed sensorineural hearing loss caused by the potentially pernicious environment of an infected open mastoid cavity and the residual matrix. 7,12 Alternatively, one-stage complete resection of the cholesteatoma matrix on the fistula has been recommended by some authors because of effective disease control and long-term hearing preservation, 13,14 in which the hearing outcomes were independent of complete matrix removal from the top of the fistula post-operatively. 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%