2017
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A narrative evaluation of a community‐based nurse navigation role in an urban at‐risk community

Abstract: The relational process of navigation as an antecedent to barrier reduction has direct implications for programme development, continuing education of navigators and quality improvement of existing navigation services. Study findings have implications for development of navigation competencies for nurses working with priority populations to address health inequities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this related to clients’ satisfaction with the service or what public health nurses perceived to be important in the delivery of any model or framework, the way public health nurses interacted with clients was seen to be fundamental to their success. This orientation or approach to practice involves being person‐centred, culturally sensitive, using good communication skills and building therapeutic relationships (Feather, Carter, Valaitis, & Kirkpatrick, 2017; Laholt, Guillemin, McLeod, Olsen, & Lorem, 2017; Noonan et al, 2017; Riding et al, 2017; SmithBattle, Lorenz, & Leander, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this related to clients’ satisfaction with the service or what public health nurses perceived to be important in the delivery of any model or framework, the way public health nurses interacted with clients was seen to be fundamental to their success. This orientation or approach to practice involves being person‐centred, culturally sensitive, using good communication skills and building therapeutic relationships (Feather, Carter, Valaitis, & Kirkpatrick, 2017; Laholt, Guillemin, McLeod, Olsen, & Lorem, 2017; Noonan et al, 2017; Riding et al, 2017; SmithBattle, Lorenz, & Leander, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy could be checked, if necessary by referring to previously submitted papers and presentations as well as discussions in class. Due to clearly defined assessment and exam criteria, feedback and follow‐up over time, it is felt that accuracy has been handled appropriately (Feather, Carter, Valaitis, & Kirkpatrick, ). With this collaboration, the meaning of the texts are represented as closely to the original situation as possible (Chase, ; Haydon et al, ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%