2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of directed functional coupling from brain recordings

Abstract: In many fields of science, there is the need of assessing the causal influences among time series. Especially in neuroscience, understanding the causal interactions between brain regions is of primary importance. A family of measures have been developed from the parametric implementation of the Granger criteria of causality based on the linear autoregressive modelling of the signals. We propose a new Bayesian method for linear model identification with a structured prior (GMEP) aiming to apply it as linear reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the model by Janssen et al (2015) does not directly estimate connectivity (but is primarily interested in assigning voxels to clusters based on their time series, with functional connectivity examined post hoc once clusters are determined), whereas HUGE provides estimates of effective connectivity. Second, Benozzo et al (2017) present a hierarchical model that also provides estimates of effective connectivity but is based on a different formalism (Granger causality) and uses a different approximate Bayesian inference scheme (Expectation Propagation). In this model, hierarchy has a different purpose than in HUGE and serves to induce sparsity in model coefficients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the model by Janssen et al (2015) does not directly estimate connectivity (but is primarily interested in assigning voxels to clusters based on their time series, with functional connectivity examined post hoc once clusters are determined), whereas HUGE provides estimates of effective connectivity. Second, Benozzo et al (2017) present a hierarchical model that also provides estimates of effective connectivity but is based on a different formalism (Granger causality) and uses a different approximate Bayesian inference scheme (Expectation Propagation). In this model, hierarchy has a different purpose than in HUGE and serves to induce sparsity in model coefficients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) The WGCA is based on F-statistic assuming normal distribution of data and is sensitive to noise. 50 As the values of the time series variables analyzed here (the leading temporal SVD modes) 14 may not necessarily distribute normally, using the F-statistic is to be considered a simplified analysis. (iii) Our fibrillation model activity is decomposed into multiple modes which could also be considered as a network of multivariate constituents with multiple information transfers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%