Systematic review of sex work interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa: examining combination prevention approaches

Abstract

Abstractobjective The incidence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections is disproportionately high among sex workers (SW). We aimed to update the evidence on the effectiveness of SW interventions in sub-Saharan Africa and to provide more insights into combination prevention.methods The Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines in a search of PUBMED and POPLINE for peer-reviewed literature published between 1 January 2000 and 22 July 2016 (registration number on PROSPERO: CRD42016042529). We considered cohort interventions, randomised controlled trials and cross-sectional surveys of SW programmes. A framework was used in the description and mapping of intervention to desired outcomes.results Twenty-six papers(reporting on 25 studies) were included. A strategy that empowered peer educator leaders to steer community activities showed a twofold increase in coverage of behaviour change communication and utilisation of health facility among SW. Brief alcohol harm reduction effort demonstrated a significant effect on sexual violence and engagement in sex trading. A risk reduction counselling intervention among drug-injecting SW showed an effect on alcohol, substance use and engagement in sex work. No study on a promising intervention like PrEP among SWs was found. We observed that interventions that combined some structural components, biomedical and behavioural strategies tend to accumulate more desired outcomes.conclusion The evidence base that can be considered in intervention designs to prevent HIV in SW in SSA is vast. The health sector should consider interventions to reduce binge alcohol intake and intravenous drug use among sex workers. Programmes should staunchly consider multicomponent approaches that explore community-based structural approaches.keywords sex work, sub-Saharan Africa, human immunodeficiency virus prevention, multicomponent Interventions, review

Unmet Need for Family Planning and Experience of Unintended Pregnancy Among Female Sex Workers in Urban Cameroon: Results From a National Cross-Sectional Study

“…75 However, the predominance of lower cadres of health care workers and peer outreach workers who often staff community-led FSW services may limit the number of staff with specific training and skills for contraception administration, especially when considering voluntary LARCs. 77,78 Physical space with adequate privacy and space for an examination table required for LARC administration may also be limited in drop-in centers. 78 Within the setting of community-based services, means to improve contraception availability and coverage may include task-sharing 79 and collaborations with services already providing family planning or ANC to offer periodic clinics with outside staff within the community-based settings.…”

The effect of mobility on HIV-related healthcare access and use for female sex workers: A systematic review

“…The search was conducted in April 2018, and we hand-searched the references of nine recent systematic reviews (Aldridge et al, 2017;Awungafac et al, 2017;Chaiyachati et al, 2014;Govindasamy et al, 2014;Lancaster et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2017;Platt et al, 2013;Shannon et al, 2015). We used a standardised data extraction form adapted from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group (Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), n.d.) and appraised the quality of the results using the National Institute for Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies (National Heart and Institute, 2014).…”

What Proportion of Female Sex Workers Practise anal Intercourse and How Frequently? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…Likewise, public health messaging to FSW on HIV transmission seems to routinely neglect AI practice. For example, none of the studies included in two systematic reviews on HIV prevention interventions among African FSW reported whether or not messaging on safe AI was included in the interventions [7,8]. This omission may contribute to the lack of awareness of transmission risk during AI among FSW [3,9] and subsequently to condoms being used less consistently during AI compared to VI (vaginal intercourse) [3,10].…”