2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6866-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-Wide Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and qPCR Platforms for microRNA Profiling in Serum

Abstract: This study compares next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that have been optimized specifically for biofluid samples, with more established qPCR-based methods for profiling microRNAs in biofluids. The same patient serum samples were analyzed by NGS and qPCR, and differences in the serum microRNA profile between HBV and HCV infected patients were investigated. While there was overall good agreement between NGS and qPCR, there were some differences between the platforms, highlighting the importance of va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, miR-4734 and miR-150-5p have been associated with prognosis in early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab (43). These conflicting results can be ascribed to moderately sized patient cohorts, heterogeneity of disease stage or treatment type, different sample source (plasma or serum), profiling platforms, normalization approaches, and limited number of ct-miRNAs analyzed (44)(45)(46)(47). Our ct-miRNA signatures were built on high-throughput analysis of samples collected within a controlled randomized study and were developed through a statistical strategy based on penalized regression model, which controls overfitting and is based on the principle of parsimony (40,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, miR-4734 and miR-150-5p have been associated with prognosis in early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab (43). These conflicting results can be ascribed to moderately sized patient cohorts, heterogeneity of disease stage or treatment type, different sample source (plasma or serum), profiling platforms, normalization approaches, and limited number of ct-miRNAs analyzed (44)(45)(46)(47). Our ct-miRNA signatures were built on high-throughput analysis of samples collected within a controlled randomized study and were developed through a statistical strategy based on penalized regression model, which controls overfitting and is based on the principle of parsimony (40,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, we validated the mass cytometry results by translating and applying the main findings into smaller flow cytometry panels. Since mass cytometry is still a relatively new method, validation by other methods is vital, as is the norm for new techniques (41). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of powerful approaches for global miRNA characterization such as microarrays [97], NGS [98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106] and simple, universally applicable assays for quantification of miRNA expression such as qPCR [107] and statistical/bioinformatics methods for data analyses and interpretation [108][109][110], suggests that the validation pipeline that often encounters bottlenecks [17] will be more efficient in this assay. There is a pressing need for accelerating use of sensitive and stable molecular markers, such as miRNA molecules, in non-or minimally-invasive media such as stool and/or blood to improve the detection of CRC [111], particularly at an early tumor lymph node metastasis (TNM) disease stage (0-1) [112,113] while the cancer is still curable.…”
Section: Current Methods For Colon Cancer Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scatter plot comparing low dose microarray data to the control group, and data presented in figure 3 shows a multigroup plot comparing miRNA-193a-3p to internal standard 18S rRNA in healthy normal control and the four TNM colon cancer groups (stages 0 to IV). Table 4 presents comparison of NGS with qPCR technologies for miRNA profiling [98][99][100][101][102][103][104]. …”
Section: Microarray Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%