The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aa6eb7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of point defects and impurities on the dynamical stability ofδ-plutonium

Abstract: We use first-principles calculations to provide direct evidence of the effect of aluminum, gallium, iron and uranium on the dynamical stability of δ-plutonium. We first show that the δ phase is dynamically unstable at low temperature, as seen in experiments, and that this stability directly depends on the plutonium 5f orbital occupancies. Then, we demonstrate that both aluminum and gallium stabilize the δ phase, contrary to iron. As for uranium, which is created during self-irradiation and whose effect on plut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in δ plutonium, the local density approximation (LDA) or GGA approximations of DFT leads to a dynamically unstable phase. However, using DFT used with orbital polarization (DFT+OP) [9], or DFT+U [39], or DFT+DMFT [12], a dynamically stable phase is obtained, even at 0 K. This seems in agreement with experimental spectra [40], which are however measured in a PuGa alloy, in which the δ phase is stabilized at room temper ature. However, in pure plutonium, the δ phase is stable only above ≃700 K. Thus, at room temperature or below, no exper imental conclusion can be drawn on the dynamical stability of the δ phase of pure plutonium because there is no exper imental measurement of phonon spectra.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in δ plutonium, the local density approximation (LDA) or GGA approximations of DFT leads to a dynamically unstable phase. However, using DFT used with orbital polarization (DFT+OP) [9], or DFT+U [39], or DFT+DMFT [12], a dynamically stable phase is obtained, even at 0 K. This seems in agreement with experimental spectra [40], which are however measured in a PuGa alloy, in which the δ phase is stabilized at room temper ature. However, in pure plutonium, the δ phase is stable only above ≃700 K. Thus, at room temperature or below, no exper imental conclusion can be drawn on the dynamical stability of the δ phase of pure plutonium because there is no exper imental measurement of phonon spectra.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Indeed, we showed in [28] that spin-orbit coupling is necessary for a good description of structural properties and that the cRPA effective Coulomb interaction is ≃1 eV. However, [39,41] neglects spin-orbit coupling, and use a large value of U, [9,39,41] use a local magnetic moment in contradiction to experiment [2] and [12] uses a large value of U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In Ce, for example, the valence fluctuation temperature is reported to reach between 2000 and 5000 K (depending on the applied pressure) within its smallest volume α phase 27,28 . Increased dynamical instability of the δ -phase lattice with increasing x is another possible factor affecting phase stability 59 , although the energies involved appear to be small compared to and .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFPT is not as widely available as the ubiquitous Hellman-Feynman forces, and therefore DFPT may not be available for all codes or basis sets in practice. Furthermore, DFPT often does not support even simple beyond DFT methods such as DFT+U, and at present we are only aware of several examples in the literature 13,14 . Therefore, DFPT is not always an option for second order derivatives.…”
Section: Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all mainstream DFT codes have fully implemented DFPT yet. Moreover, perturbation theory is not ubiquitous for techniques which go beyond DFT, and even simple approaches like DFT+U only have a few demonstrations to date where perturbation theory has been executed at second order 13,14 . Therefore, both perturbation theory and finite displacement approaches will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future in the context of computing phonons and their interactions.…”
Section: Introduction a General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%