2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-(Phenyl-4-oxy)-5-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-(1 H )-pyrazole: A fascinating molecular framework to study the enantioseparation ability of the amylose (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase. Part II. Solvophobic effects in enantiorecognition process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for such uncommon retentive behavior under methanol mode are unclear. It has already been reported that methanol can produce a stronger retention than ethanol due to its capability to promote solvophobic interactions between the CSP and chiral analytes [7] and/or induce conformational changes in the helical structure of the polysaccharide selectors [8] , which can result in a higher affinity for selectands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for such uncommon retentive behavior under methanol mode are unclear. It has already been reported that methanol can produce a stronger retention than ethanol due to its capability to promote solvophobic interactions between the CSP and chiral analytes [7] and/or induce conformational changes in the helical structure of the polysaccharide selectors [8] , which can result in a higher affinity for selectands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption appears to be confirmed by the fact that using different n ‐pentane/MeOH mixtures as eluents the competitive interaction is strengthened and shape of the retention graphs becomes concave (Fig. ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In several earlier studies, apart from H‐bonds, the importance of π‐π interactions between the selector and selectand were highlighted based on chromatographic data obtained for structurally similar analytes, while later, further insights were provided using complementary techniques on HPLC data, IR data, and molecular simulations . Moreover, in their recent reports, Cirilli et al highlighted the importance of uncommon solvophobic interactions in explaining the exceptionally high enantioselectivity values obtained for 3‐(phenyl‐4‐oxy)‐5‐phenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐(1H)‐pyrazole, further underlining the importance of interactions between apolar portions of the selector and selectand amplified under polar organic conditions …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Moreover, in their recent reports, Cirilli et al highlighted the importance of uncommon solvophobic interactions in explaining the exceptionally high enantioselectivity values obtained for 3-(phenyl-4-oxy)-5-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-(1H)-pyrazole, further underlining the importance of interactions between apolar portions of the selector and selectand amplified under polar organic conditions. 24,25 Also, on most of the employed CSPs, there is no linear correlation between the polarity of the mobile phase and retention times of the analytes. As the polarity of the linear alcohols decreases in the order MeOH > EtOH > PrOH, an increase in analyte retention would be expected with the increase in alcohol chain length.…”
Section: Csp and Mobile Phase Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%