2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excessive duration of intrauterine balloon placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another IUT technique not assessed by hysteroscopy was using devices built using a Foley catheter and a condom 24 . Alouini et al 25 also noted that if a balloon was left for more than 12 h, infection was at 10%. In 2015, the same author advised leaving the balloon for 7 h 22 whereas according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, leaving the balloon for 4–6 h is sufficient to achieve hemostasis 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another IUT technique not assessed by hysteroscopy was using devices built using a Foley catheter and a condom 24 . Alouini et al 25 also noted that if a balloon was left for more than 12 h, infection was at 10%. In 2015, the same author advised leaving the balloon for 7 h 22 whereas according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, leaving the balloon for 4–6 h is sufficient to achieve hemostasis 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study showed a positive correlation between prolonged IUBT duration time and EBL ≥ 300 ml. Alouini (19) suggests that the additional IUBT placement time may be due to persistent uterine bleeding without other techniques to control the bleeding. We believe well-designed prospective studies are required if precise conclusions are desired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in a postpublication exchange, these authors speculated that it is reasonable to considerable balloon removal before 12 hours if hemostasis is firmly established. 15 , 16 …”
Section: Procedural Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%