2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vivo vs. frozen vs. Thiel cadaver specimens in visualisation of anatomical structures of the ankle on proton density Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) through a visual grading analysis (VGA) study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opposite to that Giannini et al [14] noted an increased CSA in the fresh-frozen tendons of the posterior tibial muscles as well as increased stiffness and decreased ultimate load. An interesting study was performed by Zarb et al [46] who analyzed the quality of the Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of a live patients', fresh-frozen and Thiel embalmed bones, ligaments, tendons and muscles of the ankle. The image quality of the fresh-frozen specimen appeared to be higher when compared to the live patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opposite to that Giannini et al [14] noted an increased CSA in the fresh-frozen tendons of the posterior tibial muscles as well as increased stiffness and decreased ultimate load. An interesting study was performed by Zarb et al [46] who analyzed the quality of the Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of a live patients', fresh-frozen and Thiel embalmed bones, ligaments, tendons and muscles of the ankle. The image quality of the fresh-frozen specimen appeared to be higher when compared to the live patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of FFC is especially emphasized as it is considered very similar to actual patients' bodies and can imitate an operation situation (Aoyama et al, 2019). However, there were also areas that showed little or no significant difference with other cadaveric methods, especially with Thiel‐fixed cadavers such as mechanical testing of hard tissue (Zech et al, 2006; Gilbody et al, 2011; Zarb et al, 2017; Gatt et al, 2019). In addition, Thiel‐fixed cadavers have strength with relatively little effect of dehydration compared with FFC (Beger et al, 2020; Verstraete et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regards to MR parameters, perfusion usually accounts for the biggest differences between in-vivo and ex-vivo situations, and as ligaments are not considerably perfused, the MR parameters are expected to change less between in-vivo and ex-vivo situations. Moreover, as shown by Zarb et al (2017), although in-vivo MRI provide a better quality cadaveric MR images can confidently be used for also anatomical assessments (e.g. ligament volume) (Zarb, 2017).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%