2017
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pubertal development and anxiety risk independently relate to startle habituation during fear conditioning in 8–14 year‐old females

Abstract: Reduced habituation to aversive stimuli has been observed during adolescence and may reflect an underlying mechanism of vulnerability for anxiety disorders. This study examined the startle reflex during a fear-learning task in 54 8–14 year-old girls. We examined the relationship between mean startle, startle habituation, pubertal development, and two measures linked to risk for anxiety: behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and the error-related negativity (ERN). Puberty, BIS, and the ERN were unrelated to mean s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(140 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at the reasons to discontinue, our results are in line with previous studies (Den et al, 2015; Glenn et al, 2012; Jackson et al, 2017). The scream US was the most prominent reason for dropout of the fear conditioning paradigm followed by fear of the startle probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Looking at the reasons to discontinue, our results are in line with previous studies (Den et al, 2015; Glenn et al, 2012; Jackson et al, 2017). The scream US was the most prominent reason for dropout of the fear conditioning paradigm followed by fear of the startle probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding participants' sex, studies yield mixed findings with Glenn et al (2012) describing non-completers as more likely to be female, while Lau et al (2008) identified that males are less likely to return for extinction. Looking at the specific reasons to discontinue, studies described the US as being too loud (Den et al, 2015), participants being afraid of the experimental stimuli in general (Glenn et al, 2012), or fearing the fear conditioning task itself (Jackson et al, 2017). In sum, the information provided in existing studies about dropout rates and reasons, as well as the description of non-completers of fear conditioning tasks seems to be rather inconsistent and often lacks information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ΔERN is used to isolate activity unique to error processing (Simons, 2010), and has been extensively used in prior studies investigating the ERN (Jackson, Nelson, Meyer, & Hajcak, 2017; Kujawa et al, 2016). The ΔERN was therefore considered the primary dependent variable; however, secondary models were also run using the individual ERN and CRN variables to provide additional information regarding variations in activity to errors and correct trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five-item scale has female and male versions. Median internal consistency was good, α = 0.77 (range: 0.68-0.83) and has been associated with fear conditioning in girls [37].…”
Section: Fear Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 98%