2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2685-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The additional fusion in the management of LSS yielded no clinical improvements over decompression alone within a 2-year follow-up period. But fusion resulted in a longer duration of operation, more blood loss, and a higher risk of complications. Therefore, the appropriate surgical protocol for LSS should be discussed further.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes and healing are known to differ based on type of surgery and indication for treatment. 10,19 We recommend confining analysis to cohorts with a single surgical indication or including patients undergoing only one type of spine procedure to optimize specificity of models to predict PRO most relevant to patient condition. Future studies may investigate the benefit of cohort selectivity in external validation methods.…”
Section: Synthesis and Suggested Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes and healing are known to differ based on type of surgery and indication for treatment. 10,19 We recommend confining analysis to cohorts with a single surgical indication or including patients undergoing only one type of spine procedure to optimize specificity of models to predict PRO most relevant to patient condition. Future studies may investigate the benefit of cohort selectivity in external validation methods.…”
Section: Synthesis and Suggested Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] Various studies have evaluated the e cacy of decompression along versus decompression with fusion for this condition, but the results are still con icting. [5][6][7][8][9] Decompression alone have shown similar results in clinical outcomes compared to decompression with fusion in certain groups of patients. [5,7,9] Open discectomy with laminotomy or laminectomy alone has been considered as standard treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability during the last decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Decompression alone have shown similar results in clinical outcomes compared to decompression with fusion in certain groups of patients. [5,7,9] Open discectomy with laminotomy or laminectomy alone has been considered as standard treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability during the last decades. [10] Percutaneous endoscopic decompression which features less tissue disruption and small incisions serves as a solution to these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[6][7][8] Various studies have evaluated the e cacy of decompression along versus decompression with fusion for this condition, but the results are still controversial. [9][10][11][12][13] Decompression alone have shown similar results in clinical outcomes compared to decompression with fusion. [9,11,13] Open discectomy with laminotomy or laminectomy alone has been considered as standard treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability during the last decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] Decompression alone have shown similar results in clinical outcomes compared to decompression with fusion. [9,11,13] Open discectomy with laminotomy or laminectomy alone has been considered as standard treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability during the last decades. [14] Percutaneous endoscopic decompression which features less tissue disruption and small incisions serves as a solution to patients with multiple comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%