2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PathwayMapper: a collaborative visual web editor for cancer pathways and genomic data

Abstract: Motivation: While existing network visualization tools enable the exploration of cancer genomics data, most biologists prefer simplified, curated pathway diagrams, such as those featured in many manuscripts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). These pathway diagrams typically summarize how a pathway is altered in individual cancer types, including alteration frequencies for each gene. Results: To address this need, we developed the web-based tool PathwayMapper, which runs in most common web browsers. It can be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed all machine learning model training, testing, and evaluations using sci-kit learn (version 0.18.1) with python 3.5.2 ( Pedregosa et al, 2011 ). We processed data using a combination of pandas (version 0.20.3) and dplyr (version 0.7.1) and visualized results using a combination of seaborn (version 0.7.1), ggplot2 (version 2.2.1), and PathwayMapper ( Bahceci et al, 2017 ). R packages were run on R version 3.4.0.…”
Section: Star ★ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed all machine learning model training, testing, and evaluations using sci-kit learn (version 0.18.1) with python 3.5.2 ( Pedregosa et al, 2011 ). We processed data using a combination of pandas (version 0.20.3) and dplyr (version 0.7.1) and visualized results using a combination of seaborn (version 0.7.1), ggplot2 (version 2.2.1), and PathwayMapper ( Bahceci et al, 2017 ). R packages were run on R version 3.4.0.…”
Section: Star ★ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for the genomic alteration analysis was processed as follows: oncogenes (OGs) and tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) in the samples were annotated using information from multiple sources. These include the Sanger Consensus Cancer Gene Database (699 OGs and TSGs), the UniProt Knowledgebase (304 OGs and 741 TSGs), the TSGene database (1,219 TSGs) and the ONGene database (725 OGs) [ 34 , 86 88 ] [ 32 , 83 85 ]. Collation of data from these sources yielded a list of 3,688 OGs and TSGs, representing 2,773 unique genes (969 OGs and 1,804 TSGs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, plots of alteration patterns in genes among tumours were generated using the R package complex heatmaps [ 40 , 87 ]. Mapping of alterations onto genes in pathways shown in Supplementary Figure 8A–8C were done using the software PathwayMapper [ 88 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we plotted the spectrum of genomic alterations for the fourteen most altered genes in the samples using a custom function (Figure 4a). To assess which signalling pathways, we used the PathwayMapper software [60].…”
Section: Analysis and Mutations And Copy Number Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%