2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenopolis: an open platform for harmonization and analysis of genetic and phenotypic data

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The allele frequency cutoffs per each mode of inheritance were set to match the filtering criteria of the bioinformatics pipeline that had been used to solve the cases. As an optional LOCAL in-house dataset for variant filtering, we used UCLex [74], an exome database of about 4500 whole-exomes collected at University College London (UK) from various research groups since 2012, to which the IRD patients included in this analysis belong to. The performance of Exomiser on the IRD patient dataset was assessed using the following eight analysis settings (Table 3): 1) DEFAULT: the Exomiser score was obtained from the variant score based on allele frequency (as defined in the filtering step) and the original pathogenicity algorithms PolyPhen-2 [14], MutationTaster [13], and SIFT [75] using pathogenicitySources: [POLYPHEN, MUTATION_TASTER, SIFT], plus the gene-specific phenotype score, using hiPhivePrioritiser: {}, and omimPrioritiser: {}.…”
Section: Software Analysis Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The allele frequency cutoffs per each mode of inheritance were set to match the filtering criteria of the bioinformatics pipeline that had been used to solve the cases. As an optional LOCAL in-house dataset for variant filtering, we used UCLex [74], an exome database of about 4500 whole-exomes collected at University College London (UK) from various research groups since 2012, to which the IRD patients included in this analysis belong to. The performance of Exomiser on the IRD patient dataset was assessed using the following eight analysis settings (Table 3): 1) DEFAULT: the Exomiser score was obtained from the variant score based on allele frequency (as defined in the filtering step) and the original pathogenicity algorithms PolyPhen-2 [14], MutationTaster [13], and SIFT [75] using pathogenicitySources: [POLYPHEN, MUTATION_TASTER, SIFT], plus the gene-specific phenotype score, using hiPhivePrioritiser: {}, and omimPrioritiser: {}.…”
Section: Software Analysis Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOCAL is University College London exome database (UCLex) [74]. Ensembl transcript annotation was used across all the analysis settings.…”
Section: Primate-aimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variant calling and annotation pipeline has been described previously 3 . A total of 973,426 variants were annotated with gnomAD frequencies 7 and CADD phred score 8 .…”
Section: Variant Call Filtration and Phasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UK Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Consortium (UKIRDC) adopted this initiative by collecting Supplementary Fig. 1) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%