Physician satisfaction with a multi-platform digital scheduling system

Abstract

ObjectivePhysician shift schedules are regularly created manually, using paper or a shared online spreadsheet. Mistakes are not unusual, leading to last minute scrambles to cover a shift. We developed a web-based shift scheduling system and a mobile application tool to facilitate both the monthly scheduling and shift exchanges between physicians. The primary objective was to compare physician satisfaction before and after the mobile application implementation.MethodsOver a 9-month period, three surveys, using the 4-point Likert type scale were performed to assess the physician satisfaction. The first survey was conducted three months prior mobile application release, a second survey three months after implementation and the last survey six months after.Results51 (77%) of the physicians answered the baseline survey. Of those, 32 (63%) were males with a mean age of 37.8 ± 5.5 years. Prior to the mobile application implementation, 36 (70%) of the responders were using more than one method to carry out shift exchanges and only 20 (40%) were using the official department report sheet to document shift exchanges. The second and third survey were answered by 48 (73%) physicians. Forty-eight (98%) of them found the mobile application easy or very easy to install and 47 (96%) did not want to go back to the previous method. Regarding physician satisfaction, at baseline 37% of the physicians were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied with shift scheduling. After the mobile application was implementation, only 4% reported being unsatisfied (OR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The satisfaction level improved from 63% to 96% between the first and the last survey. Satisfaction levels significantly increased between the three time points (OR = 13.33, p < 0.001).ConclusionOur web and mobile phone-based scheduling system resulted in better physician satisfaction.

The impact of electronic and self‐rostering systems on healthcare organisations and healthcare workers: A mixed‐method systematic review

“…With the exception of three studies (Bailyn et al., 2007; Burrows & O'Connor, 1993; Silvestro & Silvestro, 2000), the risk of non‐response bias was low. Statistical analyses were appropriate in four studies (Deliberato et al., 2017; Howard et al., 2020; Wortley & Grierson‐Hill, 2003; Wynendaele, Gemmel, Peeters, et al., 2021).…”

“…For e‐Rostering, Deliberato et al. (2017) found that shift exchanges were completed faster, were more straightforward and were more reliable, using the mobile application of the web‐based scheduling system for physicians. This resulted in a significant reduction in the time devoted to organising a shift exchange ( p = .033).…”

Internet‐based self‐scheduling is associated with a high degree of physician satisfaction in an academic emergency medicine group

“…The direct costs of scheduling software can be significant, with costs being reported as $5 per provider per month for some commercial scheduling solutions. 8,9 There are a variety of research papers that address the difficulty of ED physician scheduling from the descriptive and mathematical standpoint, 11 as well as various proprietary computer programs or app-based solutions. The issue with most of this literature is that it describes "pure science" that is not readily applicable by clinicians and open-sourced solutions that will require computer science engineers to implement and will thus be more complex and costly to implement while being less user-friendly than the commercially available resources they intended to replace.…”

The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates

“…Few studies have evaluated the impact of patient online scheduling on the surgical scheduling yield, especially for orthopedic surgeons. [ 4 ]…”