2017
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors: A correlation with Ki‐67 expression

Abstract: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1499-1506.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies and meta‐analyses have shown a strong correlation between ADC and cellularity and a good association between ADC and cell proliferation (in terms of KI67 nuclear protein) in ovarian cancer, mainly of the serous subtype . In agreement with studies on other tumor types, our results show that response to treatment is clearly identified using mono‐exponential fitting with b values higher than 100 s/mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies and meta‐analyses have shown a strong correlation between ADC and cellularity and a good association between ADC and cell proliferation (in terms of KI67 nuclear protein) in ovarian cancer, mainly of the serous subtype . In agreement with studies on other tumor types, our results show that response to treatment is clearly identified using mono‐exponential fitting with b values higher than 100 s/mm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Functional MRI scans (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI), MR spectroscopy(MRS), etc.) showed a higher ability to distinguish a BOT from ovarian epithelial cancer than conventional MRI, such as T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2WI, as shown in recently published studies (11,12). However, given that functional MRI acquisition is not routinely used in clinical scenarios, the scanning parameters are not presently standardized universally and may change across MRI machines or institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with standard DWI, it can more accurately describe the complicated water diffusivity in biological tissue and provide more information about tissue heterogeneity and cellularity with parameters of D (corrected ADC) and K (diffusion kurtosis) [ 8 ]. DKI has mainly been used for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors [ 9 , 10 ]. Until now, to the best of our knowledge, DKI has not been applied for the early evaluation and prediction of the chemotherapy response of EOC, except in a few studies concerning glioblastoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma [ 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%