“…Also in our study, intra-uterine deaths were observed in 2 of the P. vivax infected pregnant patients, confirming the implication of P. vivax in complications of malaria in pregnancy. This finding is consistent with previous studies [ 40 – 42 ].…”
Background
Plasmodium vivax, once considered benign species, is recently being recognised to be causing severe malaria like Plasmodium falciparum. In the present study, the authors report the trends in malaria severity in P. vivax among patients from a Delhi government hospital. The aim of the study was to understand the disease severity and the burden of severe vivax malaria.
Methods
A hospital based study was carried out from June 2017 to December 2018 at a tertiary care centre from Delhi, India. Patients were tested for malaria using peripheral blood smear (PBS) and/or rapid malaria antigen test (RMAT). The severe and non-severe vivax malaria categorization was done as per the WHO guidelines. Sociodemographic, clinic and paraclinical data were collected from patients and their medical records.
Results
Of the 205 patients, 177 (86.3%) had P. vivax infection, 22 (10.7%) had P. falciparum infection and six (2.9%) had mixed infection with both the species. Out of 177 P. vivax cases included in this study one or more manifestations of severe malaria was found in 58 cases (32.7%). Severe anaemia (56.9%), jaundice (15%) and significant bleeding (15%) were the most common complications reported in most of patients, along with thrombocytopenia.
Conclusions
In this study, it is evident that vivax malaria is emerging as the new severe disease in malaria patients, a significant shift in the paradigm of P. vivax pathogenesis. The spectrum of complications and alterations in the laboratory parameters in P. vivax clinical cases also indicate the recent shift in the disease severity.
“…Also in our study, intra-uterine deaths were observed in 2 of the P. vivax infected pregnant patients, confirming the implication of P. vivax in complications of malaria in pregnancy. This finding is consistent with previous studies [ 40 – 42 ].…”
Background
Plasmodium vivax, once considered benign species, is recently being recognised to be causing severe malaria like Plasmodium falciparum. In the present study, the authors report the trends in malaria severity in P. vivax among patients from a Delhi government hospital. The aim of the study was to understand the disease severity and the burden of severe vivax malaria.
Methods
A hospital based study was carried out from June 2017 to December 2018 at a tertiary care centre from Delhi, India. Patients were tested for malaria using peripheral blood smear (PBS) and/or rapid malaria antigen test (RMAT). The severe and non-severe vivax malaria categorization was done as per the WHO guidelines. Sociodemographic, clinic and paraclinical data were collected from patients and their medical records.
Results
Of the 205 patients, 177 (86.3%) had P. vivax infection, 22 (10.7%) had P. falciparum infection and six (2.9%) had mixed infection with both the species. Out of 177 P. vivax cases included in this study one or more manifestations of severe malaria was found in 58 cases (32.7%). Severe anaemia (56.9%), jaundice (15%) and significant bleeding (15%) were the most common complications reported in most of patients, along with thrombocytopenia.
Conclusions
In this study, it is evident that vivax malaria is emerging as the new severe disease in malaria patients, a significant shift in the paradigm of P. vivax pathogenesis. The spectrum of complications and alterations in the laboratory parameters in P. vivax clinical cases also indicate the recent shift in the disease severity.
“…However, in the last decade, severe cases and deaths due to P. vivax infection have remarkably been reported in all endemic regions, driving the attention of the academic community to the real importance of P. vivax ( 4 ). Moreover, the occurrence of severe forms of malaria in P. vivax infections, such as cerebral malaria and placental malaria, which were previously reported to be exclusively associated with P. falciparum , suggests that P. vivax can, to some extent, present pathogenic profiles similar to P. falciparum ( 5 – 8 ).…”
Plasmodium vivax is the most geographically widespread and the dominant human malaria parasite in most countries outside of sub-Saharan Africa and, although it was classically recognized to cause benign infection, severe cases and deaths caused by P. vivax have remarkably been reported. In contrast to Plasmodium falciparum, which well-known ability to bind to endothelium and placental tissue and form rosettes is related to severity of the disease, it has been a dogma that P. vivax is unable to undergo cytoadherent phenomena. However, some studies have demonstrated that red blood cells (RBCs) infected by P. vivax can cytoadhere to host cells, while the molecules participating in this host–parasite interaction are still a matter of speculation. In the present overview, we address the evidences currently supporting the adhesive profile of P. vivax and, additionally, discuss the putative role of phosphatidylserine—a cell membrane phospholipid with cytoadhesive properties that has been detected on the surface of Plasmodium-parasitized RBCs.
“…RDT performance for P. vivax detection is lower than for P. falciparum [ 39 – 44 ] . Plasmodium vivax potential to negatively impact pregnancy has been shown [ 45 , 46 ]. Microscopy and RDT showed a low sensitivity compared to LAMP as reported in previous studies [ 32 , 33 , 47 ].…”
Background: 125 million women are pregnant each year in malaria endemic areas and are, therefore, at risk of Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP). MiP is the direct consequence of Plasmodium infection during pregnancy. The sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the placenta adversely affects fetal development and impacts newborn birth weight. Importantly, women presenting with MiP commonly develop anaemia. In Ethiopia, the Ministry of Health recommends screening symptomatic women only at antenatal care visits with no formal intermittent preventive therapy. Since MiP can display low-level parasitaemia, current tests which include microscopy and RDT are challenged to detect these cases. Loop mediated isothermal Amplification (LAMP) technology is a highly sensitive technique for DNA detection and is field compatible. This study aims to evaluate the impact of active malaria case detection during pregnancy using LAMP technology in terms of birth outcomes. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted in two health centres of the Kafa zone, South West Ethiopia. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women were enrolled in the first or second trimester and allocated to either Standard of Care (SOC-microscopy and RDT) or LAMP (LAMP, microscopy and RDT). Women completed at least three visits prior to delivery, and the patient was referred for treatment if Plasmodium infection was detected by any of the testing methods. The primary outcome was to measure absolute birth weight, proportion of low birth weight, and maternal/neonatal haemoglobin in each arm. Secondary outcomes were to assess the performance of microscopy and RDT versus LAMP conducted in the field. Results: One hundred and ninety-nine women were included and assigned to either LAMP or SOC. Six were lost to follow up. In this cohort, 66.8% of women did not display any clinical symptoms and 70.9% were multi-parous. A reduced proportion of low birth weight newborns was observed in the LAMP group (0%) compared to standard of care (14%) (p <0.001). Improved neonatal haemoglobin was observed in the LAMP (13.1 g/dL) versus the SOC (12.8 g/ dL) (p = 0.024) arm. RDT and microscopy had an analytical sensitivity of 66.7% and 55.6% compared to LAMP as a reference standard.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.