Capacity of English NHS hospitals to monitor quality in infection prevention and control using a new European framework: a multilevel qualitative analysis

Abstract

Objective(1) To assess the extent to which current English national regulations/policies/guidelines and local hospital practices align with indicators suggested by a European review of effective strategies for infection prevention and control (IPC); (2) to examine the capacity of local hospitals to report on the indicators and current use of data to inform IPC management and practice.DesignA national and local-level analysis of the 27 indicators was conducted. At the national level, documentary review of regulations/policies/guidelines was conducted. At the local level data collection comprised: (a) review of documentary sources from 14 hospitals, to determine the capacity to report performance against these indicators; (b) qualitative interviews with 3 senior managers from 5 hospitals and direct observation of hospital wards to find out if these indicators are used to improve IPC management and practice.Setting2 acute English National Health Service (NHS) trusts and 1 NHS foundation trust (14 hospitals).Participants3 senior managers from 5 hospitals for qualitative interviews.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAs primary outcome measures, a ‘Red-Amber-Green’ (RAG) rating was developed reflecting how well the indicators were included in national documents or their availability at the local organisational level. The current use of the indicators to inform IPC management and practice was also assessed. The main secondary outcome measure is any inconsistency between national and local RAG rating results.ResultsNational regulations/policies/guidelines largely cover the suggested European indicators. The ability of individual hospitals to report some of the indicators at ward level varies across staff groups, which may mask required improvements. A reactive use of staffing-related indicators was observed rather than the suggested prospective strategic approach for IPC management.ConclusionsFor effective patient safety and infection prevention in English hospitals, routine and proactive approaches need to be developed. Our approach to evaluation can be extended to other country settings.

Is a reduction in viability enough to determine biofilm susceptibility to a biocide?

“…Recent studies have highlighted the fact that current cleaning and disinfection practices might not be effective (4), despite good adherence to infection control guidelines (5,6). One possible explanation for this failure encountered in practice is thought to be the presence of bacteria in complex dry surface biofilms (DSB) (7,8,9).…”

“…3 Recent studies have highlighted the evidence that current cleaning and disinfection practices might not be effective 4 despite good adherence to infection control guidelines. 5,6 One possible explanation for this failure encountered in practice is the presence of bacteria in complex dry-surface biofilms (DSBs). [7][8][9] Multidrug-resistant bacteria have been shown to be present in DSBs on bedding, surrounds, and furnishing items taken from intensive care units, despite cleaning with chlorine solution.…”

Implementation of a knowledge mobilization model to prevent peripheral venous catheter-related adverse events: PREBACP study—a multicenter cluster-randomized trial protocol

“…The identification of barriers and constraints at the level of institutions and individuals involved should be the first step [ 53 ]. The use of a transfer model could counterbalance one of the greatest challenges for organizations, the evaluation of the impact of the implementation of research evidence in the professional context through quality indicators associated with prevention and control of infections [ 54 , 55 ]. Although life-threatening adverse events such as CRBSIs have a low incidence in our setting, the volume of PVC use amplifies its importance in terms of morbidity, mortality, and patient safety.…”

Comparison of national strategies to reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Japan and England

“…Using keyword searches taking into account relevant key literature [7], [23]- [26], an inventory of interventions was compiled. This inventory was then refined through an iterative process, including a series of team virtual discussions and emails about its appropriateness.…”