Abstract:BackgroundOur objective was to explore the impact of a single dose of an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) administered at defined times of the follicular phase or immediately after ovulation on dominant follicle development, luteogenesis and new follicle wave emergence.MethodsA prospective pilot study using a randomized complete block, controlled, open label design was conducted at an academic clinical research center. Forty-five healthy, female volunteers (25.5 ± 0.9 years, BMI 25.0 ± 0.6 kg/m2) who had not ta… Show more
“…These vesicles are released by tumor cells and most other cells types of the TME [ 159 , 160 ]. They mediate the transfer of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids such as DNAs, mRNAs, and miRNAs between tumor and stroma [ 161 ].…”
Section: Other Components Of the Ovarian Tmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs range from 30 to 150 nm, whereas microvesicular bodies (MVBs) are 100 nm to 1 µm [ 162 ]. EVs carry molecules such as CD24, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM1), which directly regulate cancer-cell migration, proteases (MMP2, MMP9), which promote ECM degradation and cancer invasiveness [ 160 , 163 , 164 ], or EV-associated mRNAs, such as miR21, which may induce resistance to paclitaxel [ 163 , 165 , 166 ].…”
Section: Other Components Of the Ovarian Tmementioning
It is estimated that in the United States in 2018 there will be 22,240 new cases of ovarian cancer and 14,070 deaths due to this malignancy. The most common subgroup of this disease is high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which is known for its aggressiveness, high recurrence rate, metastasis to other sites, and the development of resistance to conventional therapy. It is important to understand the ovarian cancer tumor microenvironment (TME) from the viewpoint of the function of pre-existing immune cells, as immunocompetent cells are crucial to mounting robust antitumor responses to prevent visible tumor lesions, disease progression, or recurrence. Networks consisting of innate and adaptive immune cells, metabolic pathways, intracellular signaling molecules, and a vast array of soluble factors, shape the pathogenic nature of the TME and are useful prognostic indicators of responses to conventional therapy and immunotherapy, and subsequent survival rates. This review highlights key immune cells and soluble molecules in the TME of ovarian cancer, which are important in the development of effective antitumor immunity, as well as those that impair effector T cell activity. A more insightful knowledge of the HGSOC TME will reveal potential immune biomarkers to aid in the early detection of this disease, as well as biomarkers that may be targeted to advance the design of novel therapies that induce potent antitumor immunity and survival benefit.
“…These vesicles are released by tumor cells and most other cells types of the TME [ 159 , 160 ]. They mediate the transfer of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids such as DNAs, mRNAs, and miRNAs between tumor and stroma [ 161 ].…”
Section: Other Components Of the Ovarian Tmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs range from 30 to 150 nm, whereas microvesicular bodies (MVBs) are 100 nm to 1 µm [ 162 ]. EVs carry molecules such as CD24, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM1), which directly regulate cancer-cell migration, proteases (MMP2, MMP9), which promote ECM degradation and cancer invasiveness [ 160 , 163 , 164 ], or EV-associated mRNAs, such as miR21, which may induce resistance to paclitaxel [ 163 , 165 , 166 ].…”
Section: Other Components Of the Ovarian Tmementioning
It is estimated that in the United States in 2018 there will be 22,240 new cases of ovarian cancer and 14,070 deaths due to this malignancy. The most common subgroup of this disease is high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which is known for its aggressiveness, high recurrence rate, metastasis to other sites, and the development of resistance to conventional therapy. It is important to understand the ovarian cancer tumor microenvironment (TME) from the viewpoint of the function of pre-existing immune cells, as immunocompetent cells are crucial to mounting robust antitumor responses to prevent visible tumor lesions, disease progression, or recurrence. Networks consisting of innate and adaptive immune cells, metabolic pathways, intracellular signaling molecules, and a vast array of soluble factors, shape the pathogenic nature of the TME and are useful prognostic indicators of responses to conventional therapy and immunotherapy, and subsequent survival rates. This review highlights key immune cells and soluble molecules in the TME of ovarian cancer, which are important in the development of effective antitumor immunity, as well as those that impair effector T cell activity. A more insightful knowledge of the HGSOC TME will reveal potential immune biomarkers to aid in the early detection of this disease, as well as biomarkers that may be targeted to advance the design of novel therapies that induce potent antitumor immunity and survival benefit.
“…Allaway et al found that a single dose of 20 mg of letrozole could lower the E 2 levels while increasing the levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level when the diameter of dominant ovarian follicles reached 12 mm or 18 mm after ovulation [ 21 ]. However, the changing levels of hormones did not result in the disappearance of dominant follicles, and in this study, the use of letrozole at E 2 peak levels could quickly lower E 2 levels to effectively prevent OHSS [ 21 ]. However, the development of the dominant ovarian follicle was not be affected and the lowered E 2 level was beneficial for embryo transfer [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the changing levels of hormones did not result in the disappearance of dominant follicles, and in this study, the use of letrozole at E 2 peak levels could quickly lower E 2 levels to effectively prevent OHSS [ 21 ]. However, the development of the dominant ovarian follicle was not be affected and the lowered E 2 level was beneficial for embryo transfer [ 21 ]. Another study also indicated that the co-administration of letrozole and gonadotropin in the IVF cycle could increase the expression of integrin in the endometrium and increased endometrial receptivity [ 22 ].…”
BackgroundWomen with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) are given letrozole before a trigger injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to lower estrogen (E2) levels, but can experience ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of oral letrozole, prior to administration of hCG, on the outcome of IVF and development of OHSS.Material/MethodsRetrospective clinical review included 181 cases of women with PCOS who underwent IVF cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo transfer (ET) (IVF/ICSI-ET). The day before the use of hCG, cases were divided into a letrozole-treated group (N=78) and a non-letrozole group (N=103). An oral dose of 2.5 mg qd of letrozole was given when the peak level of E2 was ≥4000 pg/ml during ovarian stimulation and ceased before the day of egg retrieval.ResultsThe letrozole-treated group had a significant increase in the number of retrieved oocytes, viable embryos, and fresh ET rate (P>0.05); peak levels of E2, and E2 levels on the day of the egg retrieval, were significantly higher, and the fertilization rate was significantly lower (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in the rates of pregnancy, abortion, or ectopic pregnancy between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence OHSS was lower in the letrozole-treated group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05).ConclusionsWomen with PCOS who underwent IVF, oral treatment with letrozole a day prior to treatment with hCG lowered E2 levels, but did not significantly reduce the incidence of OHSS.
“…A questionnaire to survey was performed in breast cancer patients younger than 35 years and 8% of patients rejected to receive chemotherapy because of worried about reducing their fertility [14]. GnRHa can protect ovarian function during chemotherapy for HR-negative breast cancer patients [15]. More important for clinicians and patients were to understand the state of ovarian function and protect their ovarian function.…”
Background: Ovarian function suppression is being widely utilized as endocrine therapy to reduce estrogen release in premenopausal breast cancer patients and was achieved either by medical treatment with bilateral oophorectomy, irradiation, or the Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. This study aimed to examine whether GnRHa differed from ovarian ablation on depression, sexual dysfunction and quality of life.Methods: The premenopausal breast cancer patients who received ovarian function suppression were enrolled from seven hospital between June 2019 and June 2020. Our independent variable was the type of ovarian suppression, categorized as Ovarian Ablation (OA cohort, n=174) and medical GnRH agonist (GnRHa cohort, n=389). The self-administered questionnaire (OFS-Q5) was developed and used in this study aimed to assess the depression (PHQ-9), sexual dysfunction (FSFI) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-BR23).Results: In this cross-sectional study, 563 patients with ovarian function suppression completed surveys were collected. The mean sum score of the PHQ-9 tend to be slight decrease in GnRHa cohort than that in ovarian ablation (OA) cohort (11.4 ±5.7 vs. 12.8 ±5.8, OR=1.910, P=0.079). Patients with major depression (PHQ-9≧15) was indicated significantly fewer in GnRHa cohort (31.1% vs 40.2%, P=0.025). The more surprising correlation is less patients with sexual dysfunction (61.5%, FSFI< 23) in OA cohort, a remarkable increase in GnRHa cohort (72.2%, P = 0.011). The ratio of sexual dysfunction remained lower for ovarian ablation women in long-term ovarian suppression (duration of ovarian suppression > 2 years: OA vs GnRHa, OR=1.555, P=0.037). No significantly difference for most subscales of QLQ-BR23 between two cohorts was evident.Conclusions: Our current investigation demonstrate here for the first time that medical GnRHa resulted in favour depression, worse sexual function than those with ovarian ablation, with similar quality of life. This new understanding should help to improve and alleviate adverse effect in patients with diverse ovarian function suppression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.