“…Study results are inconsistent, possibly due to different methods used to measure nCD64 (ref. [24][25][26][27] or, especially, due to low homogeneity of study samples. A great proportion of the published studies fail to properly consider different patient groups (preterm vs full-term newborns), disease pathophysiology (in case of EOS, the disease has different dynamics depending on whether infection develops prenatally or is due to postnatal microbial invasion; LOS) or time of sample collection, ignoring the dynamics of increase in markers of infection.…”