2017
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.16414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Typical Features Are Less Frequent Below a Size Cutoff of 1.5 cm

Abstract: HCCs smaller than 1.5 cm in size less frequently showed MRI findings seen typically in larger HCCs. Therefore, small HCCs are harder to detect with certainty not only because of small size but also because of the lower frequency of typical MRI findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirmed the data by Becker et al [ 26 ], that showed as the diameter and washout criteria using a step wise LI-RADS decision tree for LR3-5 observations allowed faster categorization with better inter-observer reliability while maintaining the excellent diagnostic accuracy of the most recent LI-RADS v2014. Choi et al [ 27 ] demonstrated as HCCs smaller than 15 mm showed typical finding of HCC less frequently than HCCs of 15 mm or larger in diameter. In subgroup analyses, HCCs with diameters between 10 and 15 mm showed similar MRI findings to HCCs with diameters of 10 mm or less but significantly different findings compared with HCCs with diameters from 15 to 20 mm and 20-30 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results confirmed the data by Becker et al [ 26 ], that showed as the diameter and washout criteria using a step wise LI-RADS decision tree for LR3-5 observations allowed faster categorization with better inter-observer reliability while maintaining the excellent diagnostic accuracy of the most recent LI-RADS v2014. Choi et al [ 27 ] demonstrated as HCCs smaller than 15 mm showed typical finding of HCC less frequently than HCCs of 15 mm or larger in diameter. In subgroup analyses, HCCs with diameters between 10 and 15 mm showed similar MRI findings to HCCs with diameters of 10 mm or less but significantly different findings compared with HCCs with diameters from 15 to 20 mm and 20-30 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic superiority of CEUS compared to more elaborate cross-sectional imaging modalities for smaller HCC lesions was previously described. A retrospective study found out that typical morphological HCC-features were less frequently registered by MRI than visualized by CEUS [ 33 ]. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of CEUS in the context of HCC surveillance was previously described [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Forner et al [ 18 ] presents low sensitivity (61.7% for MRI) for lesions < 20mm. In Choi et al [ 19 ] study the cutoff point was set at 1.5cm; the lesions below this threshold less frequently showed MRI features typical for HCC. All classifications systems or guidelines take the lesion's diameter into consideration but with various cutoff points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%