2016
DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.190927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for detecting mural nodules in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas and for making therapeutic decisions

Abstract: Background and Objectives:There have been few studies to date evaluating the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) for detecting mural nodules in patients with branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of CE-EUS for detecting mural nodules in BD-IPMN.Patients and Methods:Of the 427 BD-IPMN patients, 21 patients (4.9%) in whom the presence of mural nodules was suggested by CE computed tomography (CT) or ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for benign lesions like in our case, after obtaining sufficient cells by repeated fine-needle aspiration, immunochemical staining can improve the diagnostic accuracy and differential diagnosis [ 13 ]. In addition, CE-EUS proved to be a useful technique for differential diagnosis of solid lesions of the pancreas [ 14 , 15 ]. It is known that CE-EUS pattern can distinguish pancreatic disease [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for benign lesions like in our case, after obtaining sufficient cells by repeated fine-needle aspiration, immunochemical staining can improve the diagnostic accuracy and differential diagnosis [ 13 ]. In addition, CE-EUS proved to be a useful technique for differential diagnosis of solid lesions of the pancreas [ 14 , 15 ]. It is known that CE-EUS pattern can distinguish pancreatic disease [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harima et al [ 92 ] reported that the sensitivity and specificity of EUS were 100% and 61%, respectively, while those of CT were 71% and 100%. The sensitivity of CT in comparison with EUS has also been reported to be as low as 24–37% [ 91 , 94 ].…”
Section: Characterization Of Cystic Pancreatic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of CT in comparison with EUS has also been reported to be as low as 24–37% [ 91 , 94 ].…”
Section: Characterization Of Cystic Pancreatic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable results were found in later studies. Fujita et al[ 40 ] observed that CT, MRI, and EUS detected mural nodules histologically confirmed in 86%, 71% and 100% of cases. Although EUS was highly sensitive, it was not able to distinguish mucous clots from mural nodules that were correctly classified in all cases after assessing the vascular pattern by CH-EUS (Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Contrast-harmonic Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%