1983
DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[28] Gene transfer into mouse embryos: Production of transgenic mice by pronuclear injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transgenic mice may be created 'classically' through (1) direct pro-nuclear injection of exogenous DNA into fertilized zygotes (Gordon and Ruddle, 1983;Brinster et al, 1985;Palmiter and Brinster, 1986), implantation into a pseudo-pregnant female-generating transgenic progeny or (2) via injection of genetically modified mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells into a blastocyst (Doetschman et al, 1985;Gossler et al, 1986;Robertson et al, 1986) (embryonic day 4.5) with (3) embryonic retroviral infection (Jaenisch, 1980;Jaenisch et al, 1981;Soriano and Jaenisch, 1986), representing a further alternative. While direct pronuclear injection of exogenous DNA results in indiscriminate integration into the genome and is reliant upon overexpression of the transgene to generate a phenotype, ES cells can be genetically tailored via homologous recombination (Smithies et al, 1985) (that is location and enzymatic recombination of an exogenous DNA fragment into the homologous endogenous sequence; Figure 1a and Supplementary Information) in vitro prior to blastocoel insertion, representing the superior technique.…”
Section: Transgenic Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenic mice may be created 'classically' through (1) direct pro-nuclear injection of exogenous DNA into fertilized zygotes (Gordon and Ruddle, 1983;Brinster et al, 1985;Palmiter and Brinster, 1986), implantation into a pseudo-pregnant female-generating transgenic progeny or (2) via injection of genetically modified mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells into a blastocyst (Doetschman et al, 1985;Gossler et al, 1986;Robertson et al, 1986) (embryonic day 4.5) with (3) embryonic retroviral infection (Jaenisch, 1980;Jaenisch et al, 1981;Soriano and Jaenisch, 1986), representing a further alternative. While direct pronuclear injection of exogenous DNA results in indiscriminate integration into the genome and is reliant upon overexpression of the transgene to generate a phenotype, ES cells can be genetically tailored via homologous recombination (Smithies et al, 1985) (that is location and enzymatic recombination of an exogenous DNA fragment into the homologous endogenous sequence; Figure 1a and Supplementary Information) in vitro prior to blastocoel insertion, representing the superior technique.…”
Section: Transgenic Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…109 Frequently, altered gene expression encoding transcriptional oncoproteins interfere with regulatory cascades critical for proliferation, differentiation and survival of normal blood precursors, which can subsequently be studied in transgenic animal models. While transgenic mice may be created 'classically' through direct pronuclear injection of exogenous DNA into fertilised zygotes [388][389][390] and succeeding implantation into a pseudopregnant female generating transgenic progeny, the method results in indiscriminate integration into the genome and is reliant upon overexpression of the transgene to generate a phenotype. Further alternatives include injection of genetically modified mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells into a blastocyst [391][392][393] (embryonic day 4.5) or embryonic retroviral infection.…”
Section: Transgenic Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transgenic insert was prepared by cutting the plasmid with HindIII/PvuI and purified from the gel for microinjection. 75 l of the plasmid at 2 g/ml was injected into a fertilized egg of C57BL/6 mice and implanted into C57BL/6 recipient mice as described (28). Tails were clipped at weaning, and genomic DNA was extracted for genotyping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%