2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1463423616000414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient, staff, and clinician perspectives on implementing electronic communications in an interdisciplinary rural family health practice

Abstract: Clinic staff members are willing to use an e-communications system but clear guidelines are needed for successful adoption and to maintain privacy of patient health data. E-communications might improve access to and quality of care in rural primary care practices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 29 30 While these RCT results cannot be directly compared with the earlier pilot study, there is a suggestion that these results are more in line with our own findings. Research in North America has reported that both patients 10 and clinicians 31 felt that email communication is particularly appropriate for administrative requests, which may help explain our observation that administrative requests were the most common reason for completing an e-consultation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 29 30 While these RCT results cannot be directly compared with the earlier pilot study, there is a suggestion that these results are more in line with our own findings. Research in North America has reported that both patients 10 and clinicians 31 felt that email communication is particularly appropriate for administrative requests, which may help explain our observation that administrative requests were the most common reason for completing an e-consultation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Communications and online technology (such as email, video and online consultations) are currently being investigated to improve patient access and make more efficient use of practitioners’ time. So far, the evidence about use and effectiveness of such technology is conflicting 10–19 and few studies have been performed in the UK. Rigorous evaluation of online consultation systems is crucial before nationwide encouragement or roll-out of such systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recommendations around patient education, tailoring of eConsult to specific users and/or conditions are reflected in the existing literature [ 26 , 32 , 33 ]. With regard to issues around integration with existing practice processes and impact on workload, Chang et al [ 10 ] found that clear guidance around how to ensure successful adoption and integration of digital systems is key. Lastly, the general consensus that the introduction of digital services to support primary care provision is a positive step replicates the findings of Liddy et al [ 7 ], who conducted a similar study around the use of Champlain BASE (an e-Consultation tool for primary care).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uptake of such tools by primary care has been slow and eHealth use in this area is still in its infancy [ 8 ]. As identified by Banks et al [ 9 ], there are still limited research findings regarding the effectiveness of such tools [ 10 ] and there are only a minority of evaluations conducted within the UK [ 11 ]. It is imperative that such tools are fully evaluated before potential adoption and large-scale use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email has been effectively used to communicate with medical practices for repeat prescriptions, appointment bookings and obtaining test results. 22 Furthermore, internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder and videoconferencing therapy for substance misuse were both found to be at least as good as face-toface therapy. 13 23 24 utilisation is low Despite technology use for health purposes being effective and able to improve to access issues in rural areas, uptake has been slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%