2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous carbon derived from Sunflower as a host matrix for ultra-stable lithium–selenium battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rechargeable lithium–selenium (Li–Se) batteries have recently attracted considerable attention as potential energy storage devices for portable electronics and electric vehicles because Se has a high volumetric capacity (3253 mAh cm −3 ), which is comparable to that of sulfur (3467 mAh cm −3 ) [ 1 5 ], and has a relatively high electronic conductivity among nonmetallic materials (1 × 10 −3 S m −1 ) [ 2 , 6 ]. Despite these advantages of Li–Se batteries, great challenges regarding the cathode impede their practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rechargeable lithium–selenium (Li–Se) batteries have recently attracted considerable attention as potential energy storage devices for portable electronics and electric vehicles because Se has a high volumetric capacity (3253 mAh cm −3 ), which is comparable to that of sulfur (3467 mAh cm −3 ) [ 1 5 ], and has a relatively high electronic conductivity among nonmetallic materials (1 × 10 −3 S m −1 ) [ 2 , 6 ]. Despite these advantages of Li–Se batteries, great challenges regarding the cathode impede their practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, all kinds of biowaste have been carbonized and used as host materials in the cathodes of lithium–sulfur, lithium–selenium, or lithium–oxygen batteries. Within recent years, for example, carbons made from waste materials such as fruit stones or peels, algae, nutshells, soybean hulls, grain waste, other plant waste, saw dust, and lignin have been described in this regard.…”
Section: Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the latter, carbon as a conductive support is not mandatory, however, it helps to prevent dissolution and volume expansion issues . Impregnation of biomass‐based carbons with selenium proceeds in a similar manner to impregnation with sulfur, that is, usually by mixing both components and heating them above the melting point of selenium . Specific capacities are lower than in lithium–sulfur batteries (typically 500–700 mAh g selenium −1 , decaying by 20–50 % within the first 100 cycles), owing to the lower theoretical capacity.…”
Section: Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selenium possesses a higher electrical conductivity (≈10 −3 S m −1 ), meaning it has a better utilization ratio of active material than sulfur . Lithium–selenium batteries have received much attention, and the low efficiency of selenium's electrical conductivity has not seemed to slow scientific researchers’ steps in exploiting it as an optimal cathode material …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] Lithium-selenium batteries have received much attention,a nd the low efficiency of selenium's electricalc onductivityh as not seemedt os low scientific researchers' steps in exploitingi ta sa no ptimal cathode material. [23][24][25] Additionally,t ellurium, the last non-radioactive element of the chalcogen family,s hows great potential as an ew cathode material. Located at the bottom of the periodic table, Te tends to be am ore metallict han non-metallice lement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%