Abstract:BACKGROUND
Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and leukapheresis in adult beta-thalassemia patients have been recently optimized in the context of clinical trials for obtaining hematopoietic stem cells for thalassemia gene therapy. In some patients, however, CD34+ cell yield was poor despite successful mobilization and the modification of apheresis settings was mandatory for harvest rescue.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
The data of twenty adult β-thalassemia patients who were enrolled in a clinical trial for opt… Show more
“…Third, based on the observation that HSPCs were already mobilized at 4 hours after plerixafor, earlier than previously described, we implemented an earlier apheresis start time 4 hours after plerixafor administration. 21 †HbS was measured at the end of red cell exchange within 1 week of collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of predictors of collection efficiency postulated that the lymphocyte to neutrophil ratios would predict poor collectors. 21 We calculated these ratios (Table 2), but did not find sustained values greater than 1. A single value for patient 1 was found to be 2.2 only at initiation of apheresis, and fell below 1 at all other times.…”
Section: An Optimized Apheresis Procedures Allowed Effective Hspc Collection In Scd Mobilized Donorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Between 2.5 to 3.5 blood volumes were processed (Table 2). Given the poor yield of CD34 1 cells in the apheresis product, we altered our collection strategy based on reports of collections in patients with b thalassemia [19][20][21][22] or microcytosis 23 that suggested altered sedimentation of HSCs. In these patient populations, interface parameters of 5% to 10% were reported to improve recovery of CD34 1 cells.…”
Section: An Optimized Apheresis Procedures Allowed Effective Hspc Collection In Scd Mobilized Donorsmentioning
Novel therapies for sickle cell disease (SCD) based on genetically engineered autologous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are critically dependent on a safe and effective strategy for cell procurement. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of plerixafor when used in transfused patients with SCD for HSC mobilization. Six adult patients with SCD were recruited to receive a single dose of plerixafor, tested at lower than standard (180 µg/kg) and standard (240 µg/kg) doses, followed by CD34+ cell monitoring in peripheral blood and apheresis collection. The procedures were safe and well-tolerated. Mobilization was successful, with higher peripheral CD34+ cell counts in the standard vs the low-dose group. Among our 6 donors, we improved apheresis cell collection results by using a deep collection interface and starting apheresis within 4 hours after plerixafor administration. In the subjects who received a single standard dose of plerixafor and followed the optimized collection protocol, yields of up to 24.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg were achieved. Interestingly, the collected CD34+ cells were enriched in immunophenotypically defined long-term HSCs and early progenitors. Thus, we demonstrate that plerixafor can be employed safely in patients with SCD to obtain sufficient HSCs for potential use in gene therapy.
“…Third, based on the observation that HSPCs were already mobilized at 4 hours after plerixafor, earlier than previously described, we implemented an earlier apheresis start time 4 hours after plerixafor administration. 21 †HbS was measured at the end of red cell exchange within 1 week of collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of predictors of collection efficiency postulated that the lymphocyte to neutrophil ratios would predict poor collectors. 21 We calculated these ratios (Table 2), but did not find sustained values greater than 1. A single value for patient 1 was found to be 2.2 only at initiation of apheresis, and fell below 1 at all other times.…”
Section: An Optimized Apheresis Procedures Allowed Effective Hspc Collection In Scd Mobilized Donorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Between 2.5 to 3.5 blood volumes were processed (Table 2). Given the poor yield of CD34 1 cells in the apheresis product, we altered our collection strategy based on reports of collections in patients with b thalassemia [19][20][21][22] or microcytosis 23 that suggested altered sedimentation of HSCs. In these patient populations, interface parameters of 5% to 10% were reported to improve recovery of CD34 1 cells.…”
Section: An Optimized Apheresis Procedures Allowed Effective Hspc Collection In Scd Mobilized Donorsmentioning
Novel therapies for sickle cell disease (SCD) based on genetically engineered autologous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are critically dependent on a safe and effective strategy for cell procurement. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of plerixafor when used in transfused patients with SCD for HSC mobilization. Six adult patients with SCD were recruited to receive a single dose of plerixafor, tested at lower than standard (180 µg/kg) and standard (240 µg/kg) doses, followed by CD34+ cell monitoring in peripheral blood and apheresis collection. The procedures were safe and well-tolerated. Mobilization was successful, with higher peripheral CD34+ cell counts in the standard vs the low-dose group. Among our 6 donors, we improved apheresis cell collection results by using a deep collection interface and starting apheresis within 4 hours after plerixafor administration. In the subjects who received a single standard dose of plerixafor and followed the optimized collection protocol, yields of up to 24.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg were achieved. Interestingly, the collected CD34+ cells were enriched in immunophenotypically defined long-term HSCs and early progenitors. Thus, we demonstrate that plerixafor can be employed safely in patients with SCD to obtain sufficient HSCs for potential use in gene therapy.
“… 5 Considering the typical proportion of HSPC that can be corrected in gene therapy clinical trials (~50% of CD34 + HSPC) and an average recovery of 70% of CD34 + cells post-selection, a minimum harvest of ~6×10 6 CD34 + cells/kg would be required. For reasons that have not been completely elucidated, as for thalassemic patients, 6 – 7 the recovery of HSPC from SCD patients’ BM is peculiarly low (M. Cavazzana, unpublished data ). In our ongoing gene therapy trial (HGB-205, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151526), two BM harvests (each requiring an exchange transfusion program before general anesthesia) were needed to obtain enough cells to transplant the three SCD patients enrolled.…”
Sickle cell disease is characterized by chronic anemia and vaso-occlusive crises, which eventually lead to multi-organ damage and premature death. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment but it is limited by toxicity and poor availability of HLA-compatible donors. A gene therapy approach based on the autologous transplantation of lentiviral-corrected hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells was shown to be efficacious in one patient. However, alterations of the bone marrow environment and properties of the red blood cells hamper the harvesting and immunoselection of patients’ stem cells from bone marrow. The use of Filgrastim to mobilize large numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells into the circulation has been associated with severe adverse events in sickle cell patients. Thus, broader application of the gene therapy approach requires the development of alternative mobilization methods. We set up a phase I/II clinical trial whose primary objective was to assess the safety of a single injection of Plerixafor in sickle cell patients undergoing red blood cell exchange to decrease the hemoglobin S level to below 30%. The secondary objective was to measure the efficiency of mobilization and isolation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. No adverse events were observed. Large numbers of CD34+ cells were mobilized extremely quickly. Importantly, the mobilized cells contained high numbers of hematopoietic stem cells, expressed high levels of stemness genes, and engrafted very efficiently in immunodeficient mice. Thus, Plerixafor can be safely used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells in sickle cell patients; this finding opens up new avenues for treatment approaches based on gene addition and genome editing. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02212535.
“…-Check the MCV to rule out the presence of beta thalassemia minor. Microcytosis leads to abnormal sedimentation behaviour, necessitating modification of apheresis settings (Constantinou et al 2017). -Note height and weight and calculate total blood volume.…”
Section: Table 61 Before Apheresis Collectionmentioning
CAR-T cell manufacturing starts from a collection of mononuclear cells (MNCs, although specifically only T lymphocytes will be used for the preparation) from the patient using apheresis. Although several initiatives are working on the development of allogeneic CAR-T cells, currently only CAR-T therapies of autologous origin are approved in the European Union. The present chapter only discusses already or soon-to-be marketed autologous CAR-T cells and excludes investigational CAR-T cells or rare CAR-T cells approved in the context of hospital exemption, such as the ARI-001 product (Ortiz-Maldonado et al. 2021); on this topic, please refer to Chapter 3c.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.