2016
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding How the Diagnostic Delay of Spondyloarthritis Differs Between Women and Men: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

Abstract: Objective.To identify empirical evidence of diagnostic delay in spondyloarthritis (SpA), determine whether sex-related differences persist, and conduct an analysis from that perspective of the possible causes, including the influence of quality research, in this group of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Methods.A systematic review was done of delay in diagnosis of SpA in MEDLINE and EMBASE and other sources. Study quality was determined in line with the Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational studies in Ep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
6
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
59
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there is an ongoing and critical need for early and accurate diagnosis. The EMAS diagnostic delay was calculated at over 7 years and confirmed the results of a meta-analysis conducted by Jovaní et al, which found the diagnostic delay to be 8.8 years for females and 6.5 years for males [16]. Furthermore, EMAS results showed that patients on average visited two healthcare professionals, mainly general practitioners (GPs), followed by orthopedic specialists, physiotherapists, and osteopaths (excluding rheumatologists), prior to receiving a diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…First, there is an ongoing and critical need for early and accurate diagnosis. The EMAS diagnostic delay was calculated at over 7 years and confirmed the results of a meta-analysis conducted by Jovaní et al, which found the diagnostic delay to be 8.8 years for females and 6.5 years for males [16]. Furthermore, EMAS results showed that patients on average visited two healthcare professionals, mainly general practitioners (GPs), followed by orthopedic specialists, physiotherapists, and osteopaths (excluding rheumatologists), prior to receiving a diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Because most of the studies included in this review were conducted across Europe and Asia, results may not be representative of all patients or healthcare systems. The majority of the studies included primarily male patients and therefore did not capture the longer delays typically experienced by female patients or account for other sex differences [86][87][88][89][90][91][92]. Additionally, the outcome measures used to assess economic and humanistic burden varied among the included studies.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При одинаковой длительности болезни среди мужчин было больше пациентов с АС, чем среди женщин. Согласно зарубежным данным, период от появления первых симптомов до установления диагноза АС у мужчин короче, чем у женщин, в среднем на 2 года [13]. Различия могут быть обусловлены более быстрым прогрессированием структурных изменений в аксиальном скелете у мужчин с АС [7].…”
Section: материал и методыunclassified
“…В конце прошлого века на правильную постановку диагноза у мужчин уходило от 5 до 7 лет, в то время как у женщин -от 9 до 14 лет [12]. Согласно последнему метаанализу, в который вошли 42 исследования (23 889 пациентов с аксСпА, 32,3% из них -женского пола), у женщин диагностика заболевания достоверно запаздывала в среднем на 2,3 года по сравнению с противоположным полом [13]. Такая разница во времени установления диагноза у женщин может объясняться как меньшей частотой воспалительной боли в нижней части спины, являющейся одним из характерных признаков аксСпА, так и преимущественным поражением шейного и грудного отделов позвоночника в дебюте заболевания [14].…”
unclassified