The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems

Abstract

We explore the relationship among experimental design, parameter estimation, and systematic error in sloppy models. We show that the approximate nature of mathematical models poses challenges for experimental design in sloppy models. In many models of complex biological processes it is unknown what are the relevant physical mechanisms that must be included to explain system behaviors. As a consequence, models are often overly complex, with many practically unidentifiable parameters. Furthermore, which mechanisms are relevant/irrelevant vary among experiments. By selecting complementary experiments, experimental design may inadvertently make details that were ommitted from the model become relevant. When this occurs, the model will have a large systematic error and fail to give a good fit to the data. We use a simple hyper-model of model error to quantify a model’s discrepancy and apply it to two models of complex biological processes (EGFR signaling and DNA repair) with optimally selected experiments. We find that although parameters may be accurately estimated, the discrepancy in the model renders it less predictive than it was in the sloppy regime where systematic error is small. We introduce the concept of a sloppy system–a sequence of models of increasing complexity that become sloppy in the limit of microscopic accuracy. We explore the limits of accurate parameter estimation in sloppy systems and argue that identifying underlying mechanisms controlling system behavior is better approached by considering a hierarchy of models of varying detail rather than focusing on parameter estimation in a single model.

Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of an IL-6 Signaling Model

“…However, one has to caution that this is only one aspect. For example, it has been shown in work by White et al [36] that increased parameter accuracy does not guarantee an improvement in the accuracy of the model.…”

Fisher information and Cramér‐Rao lower bound for experimental design in parallel imaging

“…Further, the kurtosis parameter, K app , is less precisely estimated than is the apparent diffusion coefficient, D app . An eigenvalue analysis of the Hessian matrix for the kurtosis signal model shows that the structure of the kurtosis model itself dictates that K app will be less reliably defined than D app ; that is, a wider range of K app values will provide a good fit to the data as compared to D app , which is more tightly controlled (23,(42)(43)(44).…”

Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks

“…More generally, mechanistic models are obtained by assuming that biological systems are built up from actual or perceived components which are governed by physical laws (Fröhlich et al, 2017;Hasenauer, 2013;Pullen and Morris, 2014;White et al, 2016). It is a different strategy to empirical models which are reverse engineered from observations (Bronstein et al, 2015;Dattner, 2015;Geffen et al, 2008).…”