2016
DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2016.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the 3D genome: Aiming for consilience

Abstract: The spatial organization of genomes is studied using microscopy- and chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based methods. The two types of methods produce data that are often consistent, but there are cases where they appear discordant. These cases provide opportunities to derive better models of chromatin folding, which can reconcile the datasets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This likely reflects the fact that total Hi-C read number is normalized between samples (so increased inter-TAD signal must be compensated by decreased signal elsewhere) while FISH distances are less resolutive but absolute – a limitation in comparing Hi-C and FISH (Dekker, 2016; Fudenberg and Imakaev, 2016; Giorgetti and Heard, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This likely reflects the fact that total Hi-C read number is normalized between samples (so increased inter-TAD signal must be compensated by decreased signal elsewhere) while FISH distances are less resolutive but absolute – a limitation in comparing Hi-C and FISH (Dekker, 2016; Fudenberg and Imakaev, 2016; Giorgetti and Heard, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because SPRITE does not rely on proximity ligation, which requires two DNA sites to be close enough to form a ligation junction (Dekker, 2016; Giorgetti and Heard, 2016), we reasoned that SPRITE might identify additional interactions that occur at further nuclear distances than those identified by Hi-C (Figure 3A). Indeed, we noticed that the number of pairwise contacts observed between two genomic regions as a function of their linear genomic distance (“distance decay”) occurs at different rates when comparing the Hi-C and SPRITE data (Figure S3A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, microscopy measures the 3D spatial distances between DNA sites within single cells, whereas proximity-ligation measures the frequency with which two DNA sites are close enough in the nucleus to directly ligate (Dekker, 2016). This difference is particularly significant when considering DNA regions that organize around nuclear bodies, which can range in size from 0.5-2μm (Pederson, 2011), and therefore may be too far apart to directly ligate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, C-technologies in combination with high-throughput sequencing can provide a genome-wide view of chromatin organization from populations of cells but might overlook cell-to-cell variations. The imaging-based technologies and C-technologies therefore provide complementary views of 3D genome organization, despite some discrepancies at specific regions (Dekker 2016, Williamson et al 2014). …”
Section: Tools To Explore 3d Genome Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%