2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policies on Conflicts of Interest in Health Care Guideline Development: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess whether organisations that develop health care guidelines have conflict of interest (COI) policies and to review the content of the available COI policies.MethodsSurvey and content analysis of COI policies available in English, French, Spanish, and Italian conducted between September 2014 and June 2015. A 24-item data abstraction instrument was created on the basis of guideline development standards.ResultsThe survey identified 29 organisations from 19 countries that met the inclusion criter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…89% of disclosures in World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [14]), or scant (11% in the US National Guideline Clearinghouse [15]). Yet, disclosure of COIs is only feasible if organisations have policies or mechanisms in place to require or facilitate them; however, it appears that over a third lack them entirely [16]. Nearly all professional societies receive financial support from industry and have industry-sponsored events during their scientific meetings.…”
Section: Take-home Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…89% of disclosures in World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [14]), or scant (11% in the US National Guideline Clearinghouse [15]). Yet, disclosure of COIs is only feasible if organisations have policies or mechanisms in place to require or facilitate them; however, it appears that over a third lack them entirely [16]. Nearly all professional societies receive financial support from industry and have industry-sponsored events during their scientific meetings.…”
Section: Take-home Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this hazard, a number of organizations, including the Institute of Medicine (IOM), the Guidelines International Network, and the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Collaboration have issued (what else but) guidelines for the proper appraisal of medical literature, and for the appropriate management of conflicts of interest (COI) of members of the committees charged with implementing and summarizing recommendations. While these publications have focused attention and provided important guidance on this serious issue, it also has spawned a sizeable literature decrying the failure of writing groups and societies to fully comply with procedural and COI recommendations . Unfortunately, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recently found itself ensnared by one of these investigative studies.…”
Section: Comparison Of Aasld and Iom Recommended Commercial Coi Policmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these publications have focused attention and provided important guidance on this serious issue, it also has spawned a sizeable literature decrying the failure of writing groups and societies to fully comply with procedural and COI recommendations. (6)(7)(8)(9) Unfortunately, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recently found itself ensnared by one of these investigative studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoI have become a hotly debated concept in the scientific literature during the last few decades in medicine too [4]. Although many definitions have been proposed [5], the core of the first one-issued by Thompson in [6] and adopted by the WHO [7]-is still the most cited. Accordingly, CoI are 'a set of conditions in which professional judgment concerning a primary interest tends to be unduly influenced by a secondary interest'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoI are potentially ubiquitous in medicine [12], virtually affecting all aspects. They have been analyzed for biomedical [13] and clinical [14] research, medical education [15] and patient fundraising [16], publications in scientific journals [17,18], health care [5] and clinical [19] guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%