2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic promise of developing and implementing dengue vaccines: Evidence from a systematic review

Abstract: Several uncertainties still remain about effectiveness of dengue fever vaccines; however, the reviewed economic evidence suggests that, when available, the vaccine can be economically advantageous at moderate prices. Future research needs to confirm findings from the economic models by using actual costs and effectiveness data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Because an economic evaluation study is required by the government or insurance companies as a consideration on decision-making process, it should be comprehensively conducted to enable policy makers to make decisions more precisely while allocating resource and budget because in some countries, such as in Southeast Asian countries, dengue vaccination might be heavily subsidized by the government and would have an impact on healthcare policies. 49 The results on CEA of dengue vaccine in this study demonstrated that dengue vaccine can be considered as a cost-effective intervention, which might be developed and implemented in all regions. 50 It has been highlighted that the total cost of using dengue vaccine in Southeast Asia would be approximately $81.7 million annually, which could save $72.7 million compared with conventional treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…24 Because an economic evaluation study is required by the government or insurance companies as a consideration on decision-making process, it should be comprehensively conducted to enable policy makers to make decisions more precisely while allocating resource and budget because in some countries, such as in Southeast Asian countries, dengue vaccination might be heavily subsidized by the government and would have an impact on healthcare policies. 49 The results on CEA of dengue vaccine in this study demonstrated that dengue vaccine can be considered as a cost-effective intervention, which might be developed and implemented in all regions. 50 It has been highlighted that the total cost of using dengue vaccine in Southeast Asia would be approximately $81.7 million annually, which could save $72.7 million compared with conventional treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Hence, the introduction of a dengue vaccine may be able to tackle this issue. A study by Endo, Ziegelmann & Patel (2016), concluded that the reduction of the disease and economic burden by the introduction of a dengue vaccine could be substantial especially in dengue endemic areas, hence, may be economically advantageous when compared to other strategies of vector control alone (Endo, Ziegelmann, & Patel, 2016).…”
Section: Ijphcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two serotypes DEN1 and DEN2 are mostly isolated although the other two are also known to be prevalent in neighboring countries [4]. Efforts to curb the rapid progression of the disease by using a vaccine are underway [5][6]. Ocular manifestations of dengue fever have been reported in various countries of the endemic regions; subconjunctival, vitreous, preretinal and retrobulbar hemorrhages, maculopathy, vascular occlusions, and uveitis have been reported as the main clinical features [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%