Status of Endodontic Treatment and the Correlations to the Quality of Root Canal Filling and Coronal Restoration

Pedro, Fábio Miranda; Marques, Atc; Pereira, Thiago Machado; Bandéca, Matheus Coêlho; Lima, Snl; Kuga, Milton Carlos; Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues; Semenoff-Segundo, Alex; Borges, Álvaro Henrique

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1939

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(54 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, an incomplete filling can jeopardize the success of root canal treatment. Inadequate endodontic filling is linked to the development Materials 2021, 14, 4013 2 of 15 of periapical pathology and considered a failure of the endodontic treatment [2][3][4]. In a systematic review, Ng et al, found four factors that significantly improve the outcome of primary root canal treatment, and one of these was the presence of a root filling with no voids [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To prevent re-infection and provide a hermetic seal of the root canal system, an endodontist must aim to produce a void-free obturation. This review aimed to compare the completeness of root canal obturation between the two most prevalent methods—cold lateral condensation and warm gutta-percha techniques—using micro-CT (PROSPERO reg no. 249815). Materials and Methods: A search of Scopus, Embase, PubMed (Medline via PubMed), and Web of Science databases was done without any time restriction according to the PRISMA protocol. Articles that compared both techniques and were published in English were included. Data was extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using an adapted tool based on previous studies. Results: A total of 141 studies were identified by the search. Following the screening and selection of articles, 9 studies were included for review. Data was extracted manually and tabulated. Most studies had a moderate risk of bias. None determined operator skill in both methods before comparison. The data extracted from the included studies suggests that both techniques produce voids in the obturation. The thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques may result in fewer voids compared to cold lateral condensation. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the included studies, it was concluded that neither technique could completely obturate the root canal. Thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques showed better outcomes despite a possible learning bias in favor of cold lateral condensation. Establishing operator skills before comparison may help reduce this bias.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24 Moreover, the debate continues among dental practitioners about the selection of the final restoration type once RCT is completed. [25][26][27][28] Pirani et al analyzed a 10-year data in an endodontics master's program and found an 85% success rate of root canal treatment obturated with thermafill and AH Plus sealer. 29 Prati et al found 80% survival of ETT in their 20 years recall study with non-endodontic reasons as the main causes of the extraction of root-filled teeth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Survival Rates of Endodontically Treated Teeth After Placement of Definitive Coronal Restoration: 8-Year Retrospective Study</p>

Sadaf¹

2020

TCRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Preservation of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) depends upon several patient-related and operator-related factors. The objectives of this study were to assess the effects of different types of coronal restoration and delayed placement on ETT survival. Methods: Data on dates of root canal treatment (RCT), restoration type, and extraction time of tooth, when applicable, were analyzed for all patients who underwent RCT from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Inclusion Criteria: Root canal-treated teeth with complete preoperative and postoperative radiographs; ETT that were restorable and received final permanent coronal restorations; no periodontal disease or crack detected during RCT; and ETT with acceptable RCT quality. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who did not attend for follow-up, those had incomplete information available about the coronal restoration, and those with periodontally compromised teeth were excluded. ETT that involved any procedural error were also excluded. The teeth were categorized according to whether they underwent definitive coronal restoration 0-14 days, 15-59 days, or 60+ days after RCT. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The rate of survival of ETT of 8 years was estimated, and the differences between groups were determined after applying Kaplan-Meier statistics and log-rank tests. A multivariate Cox regression test and Wilcoxon (Gehan) statistics were computed to analyze the influence of different variables. A P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The type of restoration, opposing dentition, presence of a post, and dentistry training (year 4 or 5 students) showed significant effects on the survival of ETT (P ≤ 0.000). ETT which received crowns was 2.05 times more likely to need extraction than those in which a composite buildup was performed (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; confidence interval [CI] 1.84-2.29; P ≤ 0.000). All composite buildups were performed within 14 days of completion of RCT. There was a significant correlation between the time of placement of the final coronal restoration and ETT survival (P ≤ 0.000). Extraction of ETT was 25% more likely (HR 0.25; CI 0.231-0.277) when the final coronal restoration was placed 15-59 days after completion of RCT and 73% more likely (HR 0.73; CI 0.655-0.814) when placed after 60 days than when placed at 0-14 days. Conclusion: Timely placement of the final coronal restoration is found to be the most critical factor affecting the long-term survival of teeth after RCT.

show abstract

“… 27 ER outcomes depend on numerous factors, including patient age; treated tooth type; interindividual anatomical variation in the same teeth, the seal of the coronal restoration, the method used to access the existing filling in RC, and the possibility of repairing defects (iatrogenic or pathologic). 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of H-files and Pro-Taper universal systems in removing Gutta-percha during endodontic retreatment: A comparative study

Atique,

Ali,

Haroon

et al. 2024

Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Status of Endodontic Treatment and the Correlations to the Quality of Root Canal Filling and Coronal Restoration

Abstract: The quality of the root filling and coronal restoration is closely related to periapical health.

Cited by 21 publications

References 39 publications

Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies

Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies

<p>Survival Rates of Endodontically Treated Teeth After Placement of Definitive Coronal Restoration: 8-Year Retrospective Study</p>

Effectiveness of H-files and Pro-Taper universal systems in removing Gutta-percha during endodontic retreatment: A comparative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About