2016
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accomplished meta-analysis of data resources was demonstrated and analyzed under the guidance of the conducting and reporting meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE) [ 7 ] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. [ 8 ] Guided by search strategies such as Medical Subject Heading terms (MeSH) and keywords, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, as well as relevant major international conference, were searched for articles published from inception to 13th October, 2019, without restriction to the language.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accomplished meta-analysis of data resources was demonstrated and analyzed under the guidance of the conducting and reporting meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE) [ 7 ] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. [ 8 ] Guided by search strategies such as Medical Subject Heading terms (MeSH) and keywords, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, as well as relevant major international conference, were searched for articles published from inception to 13th October, 2019, without restriction to the language.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods were reported in detail previously (Chen, Wang, et al, 2018). Briefly, we identified epidemiological studies, based on the MOOSE guideline (Van Zuuren & Fedorowicz, 2016), and on seroprevalence of H5N1 infection among humans in China published in English or Chinese from 1 January 1997 up to 20 October 2018. The search strategy comprised of a search of English databases (including PubMed, Google scholar, Cochrane library and Clinical Trial) and a search of Chinese databases (including VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Moose-recommendations [ 18 ]. Review Manager 5.3 software provided by Cochrane was applied for meta-analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%