The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging

Taylor, Stuart A.; Avni, Fred E.; Cronin, Carmel G.; Hoeffel, Christine; Kim, S. H.; Laghi, Andréa; Napolitano, Marcello; Petit, Philippe; Rimola, Jordi; Tolan, Damian; Torkzad, Michael R.; Zappa, Magaly; Bhatnagar, Gauraang; Puylaert, Carl A. J.; Stoker, Jaap

doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4615-9

Cited by 130 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The normal caliber of jejunal and ileal lumen, without the administration of spasmolytic agents, must be <30 mm, and the wall thickness <3 mm [1].…”

Section: Learning Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Small Bowel Disease

Laghi

Hara

2018

IDKD Springer Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The normal caliber of jejunal and ileal lumen, without the administration of spasmolytic agents, must be <30 mm, and the wall thickness <3 mm [1].…”

Section: Learning Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Small Bowel Disease

Laghi

Hara

2018

IDKD Springer Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Until this moment, in most MRI motility studies the subjects were given bowel preparation with an oral solution, to create good contrast and distention in the GI tract for optimal visualization. 28 Lately interest has emerged in assessing the bowel in an unprepared state because this allows evaluation of fasted (interdigestive) motility and the response to food. 18 Although acquisition techniques require further refinement, it is safe to say that at this moment in time, we are able to visualize motility with dynamic MRI with good resolution.…”

Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: Advances, challenges and opportunities

Jonge

Smout

Nederveen

et al. 2017

Neurogastroenterology Motil

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of gastrointestinal motility has developed rapidly over the past few years. The non-invasive and non-ionizing character of MRI is an important advantage together with the fact that it is fast and can visualize the entire gastrointestinal tract. Advances in imaging and quantification techniques have facilitated assessment of gastric, small intestinal, and colonic motility in a clinical setting. Dynamic MRI is used in the stomach to measure frequency and amplitude of antral contractions. [3][4][5] It is used for the small bowel to look at segmental and global motility using frequency measures and surrogate measures. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In the colon it has been applied to assess motion and velocity of contents, wall motion and to study motility using surrogate measures. 13-17 So far there has been a paucity of validation studies. To our knowledge there is only one study in which dynamic MRI findings were compared to manometry, demonstrating 100% correlation between visualized colonic movements and intraluminal pressure changes. 17 The clinical value of dynamic MRI is under evaluation for pathologies like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) and constipation. they quantified small bowel motility using dynamic MRI. 18 In this review we discuss the challenges and opportunities in evaluating gastrointestinal motility with dynamic MRI. The first part of this review summarizes the technical aspects of the dynamic MRI technique; the second part discusses the observations made by applying the described

show abstract

“…Recently, a technical article with consensus statements on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel imaging was published [17]. It gives a detailed explanation of the patient's preparation and basic CTE technique.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It gives a detailed explanation of the patient's preparation and basic CTE technique. The consensus statements also include recommended oral contrast agents, optimal oral contrast volume and the ingestion time of oral contrast media [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Interesting Presentation of Ameboma – A Case Report and Review of Literature

Subramaniam¹,

Perumal²,

Rajendran³

et al. 2018

JGPLD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:To compare small bowel distension and bowel wall visualization among three different patients' positions (supine, sitting and right decubitus) during administration of oral contrast media in preparation for CT enterography (CTE). Methods:A total of 150 consecutive patients (104 males and 46 females; mean age 34.6 years, range 15-78 years) who were scheduled to undergo CTE were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated into the three position groups during oral contrast media administration, and there were 50 patients in each group. Two blinded radiologists independently scored the luminal distension and visualization of the bowel wall using a continuous 5-point scale (1: worst and 5: best) at the jejunum and ileum. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate differences between any two groups among the three positions for bowel distension and wall visualization.Results: For ileal distension, the supine and sitting positions performed better than the right decubitus position [for reader 1, mean: 3.4/3.2/2.9 (hereafter, supine/sitting/ right decubitus in order), p = 0.002/0.033; for reader 2, 3.3/3.0/2.6, p < 0.001/0.027]. However, there was no significant difference among the three groups for jejunal distension (for reader 1, 2.4/2.3/2.2; for reader 2, 2.4/2.4/2.2, p > 0.05, respectively). For bowel wall visualization, the supine and sitting positions were superior to the right decubitus position for the ileum when scored by one reader (4.0/3.8/3.4, p = 0.001/0.015).Conclusion: Supine and sitting positions during the administration of oral contrast media provided better ileal distension than the right decubitus position in obtaining CTE.

show abstract

The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging

Cited by 130 publications

References 93 publications

Small Bowel Disease

Small Bowel Disease

Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: Advances, challenges and opportunities

An Interesting Presentation of Ameboma – A Case Report and Review of Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About