2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2813-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer

Abstract: BackgroundPersistent dysphagia following primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancers can have a devastating impact on patients’ quality of life. Single arm studies have shown that the dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures such as the pharyngeal constrictor muscle and supraglottic larynx can translate to better functional outcomes. However, there are no current randomised studies to confirm the benefits of such swallow sparing strategies. The aim of Dysphagia/Aspiration at risk structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these contouring guidelines to mark the delineation of FSUs may reduce toxicity, leading to better outcomes [20,21]. A new randomized control trial is planned to more definitively explore the role of IMRT in reducing dysphagia [22]. Regarding our study, more than half of our cohort received IMRT-based therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these contouring guidelines to mark the delineation of FSUs may reduce toxicity, leading to better outcomes [20,21]. A new randomized control trial is planned to more definitively explore the role of IMRT in reducing dysphagia [22]. Regarding our study, more than half of our cohort received IMRT-based therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized phase III trial focusing on this issue is currently ongoing. 23 A stratified analysis was added, addressing the heterogeneity of the included patients. No significant differences in mean score changes were found in patients with added surgery, with different tumor sites or stages, possibly owing to few patients in some of the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted by this scoping review, the current evidence base is highly heterogeneous and limited to single prospective cohorts with a lack of comparison groups. Recognizing such literature shortfalls, a research group based in the United Kingdom recently released a protocol for a phase III randomized control trial, with the study aim being to explore whether reducing dose to the PCM via dysphagia‐optimized IMRT (Do‐IMRT) will result in improved long‐term swallowing function and overall health‐related QoL . This study may assist in further quantifying the benefit of active DARS sparing radiotherapy for swallow function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%