2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic divergence among invasive and native populations of the yellow peacock cichlid Cichla kelberi

Abstract: This study used the hypervariable domain of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region (CR) to assess the genetic divergence among native and invasive populations of Cichla kelberi, which is considered the first peacock cichlid introduced and established throughout Brazil and is among the most invasive populations of this genus worldwide. The maximum likelihood tree based on 53 CR sequences with strong bootstrap support revealed that C. kelberi forms a monophyletic clade, confirming that all 30 C. kelberi st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the numbers of individuals and locations examined in this study were almost certainly insufficient to fully inventory genetic variation in the likely source areas ( e.g ., Klamath and Rogue rivers). When sampling is insufficient and imbalanced ( e.g ., see Table 1), it is not surprising to find unique variation in introduced populations (Hänfling et al ., 2002; Johnson et al ., 2011; Kelly et al ., 2006; Kinziger et al ., 2019; Marques et al ., 2016; Vidal et al ., 2010). The possibility remains that the results of this study reflect a bottleneck event rather than a founder effect associated with an introduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the numbers of individuals and locations examined in this study were almost certainly insufficient to fully inventory genetic variation in the likely source areas ( e.g ., Klamath and Rogue rivers). When sampling is insufficient and imbalanced ( e.g ., see Table 1), it is not surprising to find unique variation in introduced populations (Hänfling et al ., 2002; Johnson et al ., 2011; Kelly et al ., 2006; Kinziger et al ., 2019; Marques et al ., 2016; Vidal et al ., 2010). The possibility remains that the results of this study reflect a bottleneck event rather than a founder effect associated with an introduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, C. kelberi and C. monoculus were considered as valid species, as most of the sequences of Cichla deposited in the GenBank followed Kullander andFerreira (2006) classification. Braga, 2003;Ferrareze and Nogueira, 2015;Marques et al, 2016), as also in North America, Africa and Asia (Golani et al, 2019;Sastraprawira et al, 2020), and represent a potential threat to the native fish fauna.…”
Section: Molecular Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification for Cichla spp. should have the combination of morphometric and meristic indicators like shape, form and size and baseline information are available in Portuguese, Spanish and English (Oliveira et al, 2006;Marques et al, 2016). However, in a recent scenario, the Cichla sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%