2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2259-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient health questionnaire-9 versus Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in screening for major depressive episodes: a cross-sectional population-based study

Abstract: BackgroundMajor depressive episodes (MDE) are frequent at the population level and are generally associated with severe symptoms that impair performance of activities of daily living of individuals suffering from this condition. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two tests that separately showed suitable properties in screening for MDE: the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS).MethodsIn a previous study, the sensitivity and specificity of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPSS version 22 [ 43 ] was used in data analysis. The association between depression and its psychosocial correlates was determined in two ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPSS version 22 [ 43 ] was used in data analysis. The association between depression and its psychosocial correlates was determined in two ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(PHQ-9 was used when PHQ-2 was positive.) "Positive" screens were defined using the cutoff for mild or greater depressive symptoms specific to each tool: � 10 on the EPDS and � 10 on PHQ-9 [51,52]; these cutoffs were established to include women likely exhibiting major depression and subclinical depression (or, as it is sometimes referred to, minor depression) given emerging research indicating that many of the same negative maternal and child health outcomes occur not only among women exhibiting major depression, but also women with subclinical symptoms [14]. The working definition of "access services" required a client to have at least one contact with an evidence-based service provider.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not conduct follow-up cognitive interviews with the revised PHQ-9 or compare PHQ-9 scores with the EPDS, also commonly used for perinatal depression screening. However, recent studies have found that the EPDS performs similarly to the PHQ-9 in pregnant and postpartum populations [23][24][25]. Future large-scale validation studies comparing the revised PHQ-9 to clinical diagnostic interviews for MDD diagnosis among pregnant and postpartum women in East Africa are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has also been widely used among populations of pregnant and postpartum women, with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting major depressive disorder in this population, and may have advantages over the PHQ-9 for detecting perinatal depression because the scale does not include somatic depressive symptoms which could relate to either depression or pregnancy (e.g., changes in appetite or sleeping) [22]. However, while the PHQ-9 has been less frequently used among pregnant and postpartum women [22], several studies have found similar sensitivity and specificity estimates for the PHQ-9 and the EPDS suggesting that women are able to disentangle pregnancy symptoms from somatic depressive symptoms [22][23][24][25]. Moreover, because PHQ-9 is often used in the general population, depression screening with the PHQ-9 can facilitate comparisons between pregnant and postpartum women and other groups of women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%