2016
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1214150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating a Hazardous Drinking Index in a Sample of Sexual Minority Women: Reliability, Validity, and Predictive Accuracy

Abstract: Background Although sexual minority women (SMW) are at increased risk of hazardous drinking (HD), efforts to validate HD measures have yet to focus on this population. Objectives Validation of a 13-item Hazardous Drinking Index (HDI) in a large sample of SMW. Methods Data were from 700 adult SMW (age 18–82) enrolled in the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women study. Criterion measures included counts of depressive symptoms and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, average daily and 30-day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C. Wilsnack et al, 1984) and the National Alcohol Survey (Caetano, Tam, Greenfield, Cherpitel, & Midanik, 1997; Midanik & Greenfield, 2000). The hazardous drinking index has been validated with the CHLEW sample (Riley et al, 2016) and has been used in research comparing sexual minority and heterosexual women (Drabble, Trocki, Hughes, Korcha, & Lown, 2013; Hughes, Szalacha, Johnson, Kinnison, et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C. Wilsnack et al, 1984) and the National Alcohol Survey (Caetano, Tam, Greenfield, Cherpitel, & Midanik, 1997; Midanik & Greenfield, 2000). The hazardous drinking index has been validated with the CHLEW sample (Riley et al, 2016) and has been used in research comparing sexual minority and heterosexual women (Drabble, Trocki, Hughes, Korcha, & Lown, 2013; Hughes, Szalacha, Johnson, Kinnison, et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual measures of drinking in this study were designed to replicate measures that have been validated and used in other national studies in the U.S., including the parent study—the NSHLEW (Wilsnack et al, 2006; Wilsnack et al, 1984) and the National Alcohol Survey (Caetano, Tam, Greenfield, Cherpitel, & Midanik, 1997; Midanik & Greenfield, 2000). The hazardous drinking index has been validated with the CHLEW sample (Riley et al, 2016) and has been used in research comparing sexual minority and heterosexual women (Drabble, Trocki, Hughes, Korcha, & Lown, 2013; Hughes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of symptoms of potential alcohol dependence included blackouts, rapid drinking, and morning drinking. After Wave 3 we created a HD index of responses to four 12-month indicators: (a) HED, (b) intoxication, (c) adverse drinking consequences, and (d) symptoms of potential alcohol dependence (Riley et al, 2017). Other drinking measures (in all waves) include age of drinking onset, drinking contexts, drinking expectancies, and 30-day and 12-month quantity and frequency of partner's drinking.…”
Section: Drinking Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HD indicators were drawn from the Hazardous Drinking Index (HDI), developed using CHLEW Wave 3 data from both the original and new samples. 46 The HDI is a comprehensive measure of HD that was found to have concurrent validity. Compared to the CAGE, the HDI had higher KR-20 reliability (HDI = 0.80 vs. CAGE = 0.74) and demonstrated better predictive efficacy and balance between sensitivity and specificity to detect alcohol dependence (HDI = 0.89 vs. CAGE = 0.84).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%