2016
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suboptimal Viral Suppression Rates Among HIV-Infected Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Meta-analysis

Abstract: Viral suppression rates among children on ART in LMICs were low and considerably poorer than those previously found in adults in LMICs and children in high-income countries. Little progress has been made in improving viral suppression rates over the past years. Without increased efforts to improve pediatric HIV treatment, the 90-90-90 goal for children in LMIC will not be reached.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
85
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
23
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the suppression rates are about 10%−20% lower among pediatric and adolescent populations. This is similar to findings from other countries [31, 32]. Many factors account for low viral suppression rates among these groups, including poor adherence to ART, limited number of appropriate pediatric-friendly ARV formulations, nondisclosure of HIV status, lack of a support network, stigma, poor compliance with VL testing guidelines, and keeping patients on failing regimens [33–35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the suppression rates are about 10%−20% lower among pediatric and adolescent populations. This is similar to findings from other countries [31, 32]. Many factors account for low viral suppression rates among these groups, including poor adherence to ART, limited number of appropriate pediatric-friendly ARV formulations, nondisclosure of HIV status, lack of a support network, stigma, poor compliance with VL testing guidelines, and keeping patients on failing regimens [33–35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A large meta-analysis conducted in 2016 of both observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating viral suppression identified 72 studies reporting on 51,374 children <18 years. After 12 months on first-line ART, viral suppression was achieved by 64.7% (95% CI: 57.5-71.8) in studies conducted from 2000 to 2005, 74.2% (95% CI: 70.2-78.2) in studies conducted from 2006 to 2009 and 72.7% (95% CI: 62.6-82.8) in studies conducted after 2010 [11]. These rates are considerably lower than those typically observed in adults, including in a meta-analysis of virologic outcomes in adults, which found viral suppression rates >80% in the first five years on ART [12].…”
Section: Reasons For Prioritizing Hiv-infected Infants and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method would facilitate cross-comparison of research studies by providing a standard for viral load pattern classification. Such standardization would be immensely useful in meta-analyses of diverse research reports [32][33][34][35][36]. It is possible that, in the future additional viral load patterns may emerge with, for example, the emergence of new HIV variants that are resistant to, or escape suppression of, current therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code used to analyze the data can be found on github at https://github.com/SamirRCHI/Viral Load Data Categorization. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] week range for a different part of their statistical analysis; however, in our categorical implementation, we modify the range to 24-32 weeks to build coherent categories according to the procedure they outline (as we are about to describe). Phillips et.…”
Section: Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%