2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Clinical Improvement in Assertive Community Treatment for Adolescents: A Pilot Naturalistic Observational Study

Abstract: AcknowledgementWe would like to thanks all health professionals from the ACT teams, and especially Fabienne Dutoit, Aymeric Faucherand, Esperanza Senent, Mélanie Cherix, Coralie Heinz, Caroline Graap.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the quality of the 13 studies, study designs are specified in Table 1 . Most studies had a pre-post design and lacked a control group [ 6 , 8 , 41 43 , 46 48 ]. One study used a quasi-experimental design with a control group, but patients were not randomized [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the quality of the 13 studies, study designs are specified in Table 1 . Most studies had a pre-post design and lacked a control group [ 6 , 8 , 41 43 , 46 48 ]. One study used a quasi-experimental design with a control group, but patients were not randomized [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies examined adolescents up to age 18, with a wide variety of psychiatric problems including substance abuse, psychotic, emotional, and developmental problems. Patients received youth-ACT as the only treatment [ 6 , 8 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 46 48 ] or as an aftercare program [ 49 , 50 , 52 ]. The average ages of included patients ranged from 15 to 17 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the proven efficacy of ACT on adult populations in the United States, research in Europe on both adult and adolescent populations has not come to definite conclusions [30]. The few European studies [1,31,32] concluding on a therapeutic efficacy of ACT only reported statistically significant changes. Although statistical significance is a good hint of the efficacy of ACT, it doesn't necessary imply that the treatment results in clinical improvements felt by patients, nor that the considerable financial investment made in ACT leads to tangible results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%