2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of Atrial Fibrillation as a Marker for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Both Primary and Secondary Prevention in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially AF represents an important predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and SCD. An increased risk of tachyarrhythmia goes along with a higher incidence of short-long cycles that can degenerate into VT among AF patients [9, 31, 32]. It may therefore be assumed that the increased risk of recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia is triggered by the interaction of digitalis and AF, rather than by digitalis therapy its own.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially AF represents an important predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and SCD. An increased risk of tachyarrhythmia goes along with a higher incidence of short-long cycles that can degenerate into VT among AF patients [9, 31, 32]. It may therefore be assumed that the increased risk of recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia is triggered by the interaction of digitalis and AF, rather than by digitalis therapy its own.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need for improved risk stratification in VT occurrence for primary-prevention ICD indication. In previous studies, some predictors, such as prolonged QRS duration and existence of atrial fibrillation, were associated with a poor prognosis [12, 13], but whether these factors are associated with an increased risk of sudden death remains to be determined. In the present study, with the exception of serum UA, noninvasive parameters were not identified as predictors for appropriate ICD therapy for VT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other risk factors implicated to increase the risk of appropriate shocks are diabetes, 443 , 447 elevated baseline NT-proBNP and BNP, 448 NSVT, 445 , 449 left atrial diameter, 443 , 449 and impaired renal function. 450 Data from SCD-HeFT and MADIT II trials have found a higher NYHA class, a lower LVEF, lack of use of beta-blocker therapy and single-chamber ICD as significant independent predictors for appropriate ICD shocks.…”
Section: How To Assess Risk For Adverse Outcomes In Patients With Venmentioning
confidence: 99%