2016
DOI: 10.1177/0891988716666381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Frontal Assessment Battery

Abstract: Background: The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a short battery designed to assess frontal executive functioning, but data for interpretation of performance are limited. Objectives: The Trinity, Ulster, Department of Agriculture (TUDA) study provided the opportunity to derive performance data from a large sample of community-dwelling hospital outpatient or general practitioner (GP) attenders. Methods: Normative analysis based on 2508 TUDA participants meeting these criteria: Mini-Mental State Examination (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norm scores were computed using a large Dutch normative database from the Advanced Neuropsychological Diagnostics Infrastructure (ANDI; de Vent et al, 2016). As normative data for the FAB were unavailable in ANDI, these norm scores were generated using another normative database (Coen et al, 2016). Moreover, given that floor performance on the TMT ratio scores and delayed recall of the 8-Word Test occurred more frequently in AD and MCI relatively to SCD (see Supplementary Table A), we also repeated our analyses while deriving the compound scores without these particular (sub-)tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norm scores were computed using a large Dutch normative database from the Advanced Neuropsychological Diagnostics Infrastructure (ANDI; de Vent et al, 2016). As normative data for the FAB were unavailable in ANDI, these norm scores were generated using another normative database (Coen et al, 2016). Moreover, given that floor performance on the TMT ratio scores and delayed recall of the 8-Word Test occurred more frequently in AD and MCI relatively to SCD (see Supplementary Table A), we also repeated our analyses while deriving the compound scores without these particular (sub-)tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those derived from screening tests were not considered, as subtests usually lack validation and may be vulnerable to ceiling effects, which make them relatively insensitive when used in isolation [33]. Such screening tests included not only pen-and-paper tests, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination [34], Frontal Assessment Battery [35,36], Clock Drawing Test [37][38][39][40], Bender-Gestalt Test [41], and ADAS-Cog [42], but also computerized tests such as NeuroCogFX [43] and c.I Test [44].…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that this correlation is often high, as individuals with FTD often show signs of general cognitive impairment (Goh et al, 2019;Slachevsky et al, 2004). Furthermore, the impact of cognitive reserve on cognitive function has been highlighted in both individuals at risk for FTD and those without, which adds novelty to our findings (Ong et al, 2021;Coen et al, 2016). Despite limitations, the inclusion of the effect of cognitive reserve in our analysis enriches an understanding of its role in different clinical contexts (Pellas & Damberg, 2024;Woodford & George, 2007).…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%