2017
DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Association between ZBTB20 rs9841504 Polymorphism and Gastric and Esophageal Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: In summary, our work suggests that the ZBTB20 rs9841504 polymorphism is a protective factor for gastric cancer rather than esophageal cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the remaining four loci that were identified in the GWAS of the Chinese population, 3q13.31 indicated significant association with the same risk allele ( P = 0.0167), whereas the remaining three loci did not. Concordant with this result, 3q13.31 was validated in the meta‐analysis . Considering the sufficient number of samples used in our imputation analysis (6171 cases and 27 178 controls), these results would be due to differences in host genetic background and/or H. pylori subtypes between Chinese and Japanese.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the remaining four loci that were identified in the GWAS of the Chinese population, 3q13.31 indicated significant association with the same risk allele ( P = 0.0167), whereas the remaining three loci did not. Concordant with this result, 3q13.31 was validated in the meta‐analysis . Considering the sufficient number of samples used in our imputation analysis (6171 cases and 27 178 controls), these results would be due to differences in host genetic background and/or H. pylori subtypes between Chinese and Japanese.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Concordant with this result, 3q13.31 was validated in the meta-analysis. 53 Considering the sufficient number of samples used in our imputation analysis (6171 cases and 27 178 controls), these results would be due to differences in host genetic background and/or H. pylori subtypes 54 between Chinese and Japanese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consistently, our data showed that ZBTB20 knockdown in gastric cancer cell lines markedly suppressed cell proliferation, invasion and migration while ZBTB20 overexpression significantly promoted those. However, Shi et al, found a significant association between the rs9841504 polymorphism in ZBTB20 and decreased gastric cancer susceptibility, suggested that the ZBTB20 rs9841504 polymorphism is a protective factor for gastric cancer [11]. Meanwhile, no statistical difference was found between the rs9841504 polymorphism in ZBTB20 and gastric cancer risk in other previous studies [16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 20 (ZBTB20) has been implicated in developmental neurogenesis [7], glucose and lipid homoeostasis, and the tumorigenesis of glioblastoma [8], liver [9] and lung cancer [10]. Polymorphisms of ZBTB20 appeared to be associated with gastric cancer susceptibility in allelic, homozygous, dominant and recessive models, suggesting its role in gastric cancer [11]. NF-jB is activated in a variety of cancers as detected by phosphorylation and degradation of IjBa proteins, phosphorylation of RelA/p65, and elevated expression of NF-jB target genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 (Tab. 1) (References in Table 1: Chang et al, 2014[ 1 ]; Chen et al, 2015[ 2 ]; Cheng et al, 2015[ 3 ]; Dai et al, 2015[ 4 ]; Deng et al, 2014[ 5 ]; Gong et al, 2016[ 9 ]; Han et al, 2012[ 11 ]; He et al, 2013[ 12 ]; Hua et al, 2014[ 14 ]; Jia et al, 2017[ 16 ]; Kuang et al, 2014[ 17 ]; Li et al, 2015[ 20 ]; Li et al, 2016[ 18 ]; Li et al, 2017[ 19 ]; Liang et al, 2018[ 21 ]; Liu et al, 2011[ 23 ]; Liu et al, 2011[ 24 ]; Liu et al, 2014[ 25 ]; Liu et al, 2014[ 26 ]; Lu et al, 2012[ 27 ]; Ma et al, 2013[ 29 ]; Ma et al, 2013[ 30 ]; Ma et al, 2017[ 28 ]; Mo et al, 2016[ 31 ]; Mocellin et al, 2015[ 32 ]; Namazi et al, 2018[ 35 ]; Pabalan et al, 2015[ 36 ]; Peng and Xu, 2015[ 37 ]; Qi et al, 2016[ 38 ]; Qin et al, 2017[ 39 ]; Ribeiro et al, 2017[ 41 ]; Shen et al, 2014[ 47 ]; Shi et al, 2014[ 48 ]; Shi et al, 2017[ 49 ]; Shi et al, 2018[ 50 ]; Tian et al, 2012[ 52 ]; Wang et al, 2013[ 53 ]; Wang et al, 2014[ 54 ]; Wang et al, 2015[ 56 ]; Wang et al, 2015[ 57 ]; Wang et al, 2016[ 55 ]; Wu et al, 2015[ 58 ]; Xie et al, 2017[ 59 ]; Xu et al, 2014[ 61 ]; Xu et al, 2014[ 63 ]; Xu et al, 2015[ 62 ]; Xu et al, 2018[ 60 ]; Yadav et al, 2018[ 64 ]; Yan et al, 2013[ 65 ]; Yang et al, 2014[ 66 ]; Yang et al, 2016[ 67 ]; Ye et al, 2017[ 68 ]; Yu et al, 2014[ 69 ]; Zhang et al, 2012[ 72 ]; Zhang et al, 2013[ 71 ]; Zhang et al, 2015[ 74 ]; Zhang et al,...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%