2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1528-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate

Abstract: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is a safe surgical procedure in male patients with external prolapse. However, a high overall reoperation rate was noticed due to recurrent rectal and residual mucosal prolapse. This suggests that the ventral rectopexy technique should be modified or combined with other abdominal or perineal methods when treating male rectal prolapse patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 38 studies reporting the outcome of the use of mesh with rectopexy [13‐51] and one study reporting the outcome of resection suture rectopexy [45]. It was not possible to estimate the effect from pooled data in GRADE evidence due to lack of a comparator in all studies and one non‐mesh study with 0% recurrence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 38 studies reporting the outcome of the use of mesh with rectopexy [13‐51] and one study reporting the outcome of resection suture rectopexy [45]. It was not possible to estimate the effect from pooled data in GRADE evidence due to lack of a comparator in all studies and one non‐mesh study with 0% recurrence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate anterior rectal dissection and inadequate fixation of the mesh to the anterior rectal wall or sacral promontory and the type of mesh used are some of the reported technical factors [8,15]. Furthermore, sex, BMI, and previous history of prolapse repair [9,11] have been suggested as the clinical factors. Nonetheless, these studies did not determine the risk factors for recurrence using multivariate analysis except that by Fu et al [9] who evaluated the factors contributing to recurrence in female patients using a Cox hazard regression model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some technical aspects are emerging from the literature and deserve consideration; in a female patient, the deep anterior dissection of the rectum from the vagina does not carry particular risks. In a male however, the deep anterior dissection of the rectum from seminal vesicles and prostate may be more challenging and even if it seems to be safe in terms of incidence of postoperative complications such as sexual disturbances (impotence, retrograde ejaculation) [42], unwilling problems in a young patient, reoperation rate has been reported to be not negligible [43], with 33% further surgery either due to persistent or recurrent prolapse. Other concerns may arise as far as mesh use in rectal surgery and in fact a new type of postoperative morbidity has been observed in case of ventral mesh rectopexy, that is mesh erosion.…”
Section: Proctological Diseases In Surgical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%