2016
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2016.1219813
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative protein profiling of B16 mouse melanoma cells susceptible and non-susceptible to alphavirus infection: Effect of the tumor microenvironment

Abstract: Alphavirus vectors are promising tools for cancer treatment. However, relevant entry mechanisms and interactions with host cells are still not clearly understood. The first step toward a more effective therapy is the identification of novel intracellular alterations that could be associated with cancer aggressiveness and could affect the therapeutic potential of these vectors. In this study, we observed that alphaviruses efficiently infected B16 mouse melanoma tumors/tumor cells in vivo, whereas their transduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SP compound 6e was selected for fluorescent cell imaging analysis. First, the compound was used to label the BHK-21 cells that are widely used in molecular biology studies [ 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Commercially available CellTracker™ Deep Red dye (Invitrogen) was used as a control because it has a similar emission range (ex/em: 630/660).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP compound 6e was selected for fluorescent cell imaging analysis. First, the compound was used to label the BHK-21 cells that are widely used in molecular biology studies [ 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Commercially available CellTracker™ Deep Red dye (Invitrogen) was used as a control because it has a similar emission range (ex/em: 630/660).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is increasingly evident that the efficacy of immunomodulatory strategies depends on the presence of a baseline immune response [ 15 ]. Thus, many approaches may not be effective, primarily due to the immunosuppressive TIME preventing efficient T cell infiltration and may require additional therapeutic interventions to amplify the immune threshold to result in a more robust therapeutic response [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Compared to other therapies, non-ablative pFUS modulates the TIME without thermal damage and results in dynamic changes to immune cell populations in the regional LN and Sp that were different from the targeted tumors [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several CCTFs can demonstrate stimulatory or inhibitory effects on tumor development and progression depending on immune-suppressive or anti-tumor molecular profiles within the TME. Moreover, tumors originating from various organs are likely to contain contributions of cold and hot phenotypic zones, which might be influenced by external physical stimuli in divergent or similar patterns [48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%