2016
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of upper gut hormones and motility to the energy intake-suppressant effects of intraduodenal nutrients in healthy, lean men - a pooled-data analysis

Abstract: We have previously identified pyloric pressures and plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) concentrations as independent determinants of energy intake following administration of intraduodenal lipid and intravenous CCK. We evaluated in healthy men whether these parameters also determine energy intake in response to intraduodenal protein, and whether, across the nutrients, any predominant gastrointestinal (GI) factors exist, or many factors make small contributions. Data from nine published studies, in which antropylorod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the lack of effect of Q-HCl to modulate upper GI motility, particularly pyloric pressures, or stimulate CCK, both of which we have identified as key determinants of the subsequent suppression of energy intake in response to duodenal nutrients, 1,34 we found no effect of Q-HCl to reduce appetite or energy intake. In a recent study, DB reduced hunger ratings in the fasting state, and decreased hunger and increased satiety after a meal, but did not significantly reduce caloric intake from a standardized meal, with substantial variability between individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In line with the lack of effect of Q-HCl to modulate upper GI motility, particularly pyloric pressures, or stimulate CCK, both of which we have identified as key determinants of the subsequent suppression of energy intake in response to duodenal nutrients, 1,34 we found no effect of Q-HCl to reduce appetite or energy intake. In a recent study, DB reduced hunger ratings in the fasting state, and decreased hunger and increased satiety after a meal, but did not significantly reduce caloric intake from a standardized meal, with substantial variability between individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on these findings, we hypothesised that intraduodenal infusion of L-valine would also reduce energy intake. In contrast to our expectation, L-valine was ineffective—it did not affect subsequent energy intake, nor GI functions of relevance to the regulation of energy intake, specifically the stimulation of plasma CCK and pyloric pressures [32,33]. While it is possible that L-valine may be an amino acid that does not play a role in appetite regulation, it is worth noting the important contributory roles of orosensory and gastric influences (which we bypassed in the current study) with gut hormone release and the modulation of energy intake [34,35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This is achieved by well-characterised effects of nutrients on pressures in the antropyloroduodenal region [27], mediated by gut hormones released in response to nutrients [2,3,10]. Nutrients in the intestinal lumen, particularly lipid and protein, also modulate appetite and subsequent energy intake [28,29], and changes in both motility and gut hormones play critical roles [30,31].…”
Section: Gi Sensing Of Intraluminal Meal-related Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects occur in a load-dependent manner, and are associated with the suppression of energy intake [28,32]. In fact, the magnitude of the stimulation of pyloric pressures and plasma CCK, as indicators of the GI sensing of nutrients, have been identified as independent determinants of energy intake in response to intraduodenal administration of particularly fat and also protein [30,31].…”
Section: Gi Sensing Of Intraluminal Meal-related Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%