2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4961872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crazing of nanocomposites with polymer-tethered nanoparticles

Abstract: The crazing behavior of polymer nanocomposites formed by blending polymer grafted nanoparticles with an entangled polymer melt is studied by molecular dynamics simulations. We focus on the three key differences in the crazing behavior of a composite relative to the pure homopolymer matrix, namely, a lower yield stress, a smaller extension ratio, and a grafted chain length dependent failure stress. The yield behavior is found to be mostly controlled by the local nanoparticle-grafted polymer interfacial energy, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Meng et al have looked at the crazing of glassy PNCs with polymer-grafted NPs. 281 These workers have also looked at the distribution of mechanical stresses in the material. While these are informative, there is currently no understanding of the role of NP dispersion on the mechanical properties that result.…”
Section: A Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Meng et al have looked at the crazing of glassy PNCs with polymer-grafted NPs. 281 These workers have also looked at the distribution of mechanical stresses in the material. While these are informative, there is currently no understanding of the role of NP dispersion on the mechanical properties that result.…”
Section: A Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other one is the tri-axial deformation to induce the failure, namely the simulation box is extended in one direction, while the other two dimensions are held xed, which results in a positive effective stress in all directions. 40,41 In this case, there is no rigid walls. Periodic boundary conditions are applied in three directions.…”
Section: Model and Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the latter approach to induce the occurrence of the voids. 40,41 The uniaxial tensile tests are performed by stretching the simulation box along one direction at a constant strain velocity (10 10 S À1 adopted by the previously published works [42][43][44] ) while keeping the box length unchanged in other two directions. Meanwhile, the average stress-strain curve is obtained by independently deforming each system along x, y and z directions, respectively.…”
Section: Model and Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And as P/N increases, w decreases. 29 Further, if the brushmatrix interactions are repulsive, 30 interaction decreases and leads to a lower yield strength than pure matrix. For attractive filler-matrix interactions, computation predicts that the yield strength will be the same as the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%