2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-016-9808-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Genes and Environment in Degree of Partner Self-Similarity

Abstract: Choice of romantic partner is an enormously important component of human life, impacting almost every facet of day-to-day existence, however; the processes underlying this choice are remarkably complex and have so far been largely resistant to scientific explanation. One consistent finding is that, on average, members of romantic dyads tend to be more alike than would be expected by chance. Selecting for self-similarity is at least partially driven by phenotypic matching wherein couples share similar phenotype… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may also be that the current environment remains important and that the spouse is a better aggregated indicator of the current environment than the sibling with whom one usually no longer shares a home in adulthood. We find no couple similarity component for personality, which is consistent with much weaker assortative mating on personality, especially neuroticism and extraversion [86][87][88].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, it may also be that the current environment remains important and that the spouse is a better aggregated indicator of the current environment than the sibling with whom one usually no longer shares a home in adulthood. We find no couple similarity component for personality, which is consistent with much weaker assortative mating on personality, especially neuroticism and extraversion [86][87][88].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This analysis comes with the caveat that these SGE estimates cannot be strictly interpreted as causal because controlling for ego's PGS will only partly control for selection. There may be other genetic and non-genetic factors that come into play with partner selection 28,33 . These selection processes could indirectly lead to an association between the partner's PGS and ego's outcome, i.e., spurious SGE.…”
Section: Partners In Health? Investigating Social Genetic Effects Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which partners are alike has been studied extensively during the past decades showing that assortative mating is important in physical characteristics, lifestyle, intelligence, and educational attainment (Schwartz, 2013;Luo, 2017). Prior research has indicated that for educational assortment spousal correlations range from 0.37 to 0.66 (Abdellaoui et al, 2015;Hur, 2016;Robinson et al, 2017;Sherlock et al, 2017; OPEN ACCESS EDITED BY Phil H. Lee, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States Tambs, Sundet, and Berg, 1993;Torvik et al, 2021;Zietsch et al, 2012). Over the past 50 years, the level of educational assortment has steadily increased in the United States, Denmark, Norway, the United Kingdom, and Germany (Eika et al, 2019;Mare, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%